Mal: We're still flying. Simon: That's not much. Mal: It's enough.
'Serenity'
Buffistechnology 3: "Press Some Buttons, See What Happens."
Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!
Tom Scola - Jun 11, 2012 9:34:21 am PDT #20255 of 25501
Remember that the frontier of the Rebellion is everywhere. And even the smallest act of insurrection pushes our lines forward.
§ ita § - Jun 12, 2012 7:37:56 am PDT #20256 of 25501
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I'm poking around the Sun site, and I can't work out how to find a specific (old) version of the JDK. I need to recreate an older deployment, and we were using 1.6.something, not the versions 6 & 7 currently on offer.
But I can't find a historical page.
Can anyone help?
Gudanov - Jun 12, 2012 7:47:37 am PDT #20257 of 25501
Coding and Sleeping
It needs to be older than JDK 1.6 update 32?
§ ita § - Jun 12, 2012 8:18:24 am PDT #20258 of 25501
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
1.6.0_16-b01, to be exact.
Gudanov - Jun 12, 2012 8:32:21 am PDT #20259 of 25501
Coding and Sleeping
§ ita § - Jun 12, 2012 9:11:58 am PDT #20260 of 25501
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
You're going to have to talk slowly and patiently to me. I don't see 1.6 on that page--it goes from 1.4 to 5. What don't I understand about the numbering scheme? Or here: [link] or here: [link]
At which point I'm more than confused.
Gudanov - Jun 12, 2012 9:17:47 am PDT #20261 of 25501
Coding and Sleeping
Sorry, didn't realize the confusion.
Java 5 is 1.5, Java 6 is 1.6, Java 7 is 1.7.
§ ita § - Jun 12, 2012 9:19:13 am PDT #20262 of 25501
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Oh, that's NOT CONFUSING AT ALL, ORACLE.
Gudanov - Jun 12, 2012 9:24:48 am PDT #20263 of 25501
Coding and Sleeping
Yeah, the documentation says Java 6, but 'java -version' tells the real story. Sort of like how Windows 7 is Windows 6.1.
What's wrong with a good old honest version number? Cars should have them too: you want to avoid that Dodge Dart 1.0 and wait for Dodge Dart 1.2.1.
tommyrot - Jun 12, 2012 9:48:36 am PDT #20264 of 25501
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
What's wrong with a good old honest version number? Cars should have them too: you want to avoid that Dodge Dart 1.0 and wait for Dodge Dart 1.2.1.
My car is on Microsoft service pack one for the infotainment system and it also has service packs for the ABS brakes and the automatic transmission.
Dunno who did the service pack for the transmission, but it made a huge difference--the car shifts much smoother now.