That's beautiful. Or taken literally, incredibly gross.

Buffy ,'Potential'


Buffistechnology 3: "Press Some Buttons, See What Happens."

Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!


DCJensen - Apr 09, 2011 5:22:36 am PDT #16457 of 25501
All is well that ends in pizza.

Typo Boy, Adobe bought Pagemaker. [link]


Typo Boy - Apr 09, 2011 7:47:29 am PDT #16458 of 25501
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.

Is Pagemaker still current? I thought it had been outcompleted, and fallen way behind in capability.


Typo Boy - Apr 09, 2011 8:12:28 am PDT #16459 of 25501
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.

OK, 7 was the version from 2001. Officially does not run on Windows 7 though I bet it does. I don't care about obsolete if I can get my work done.


NoiseDesign - Apr 09, 2011 12:35:23 pm PDT #16460 of 25501
Our wings are not tired

Pagemaker hasn't been updated since 2004. From what I understand it won't install on anything newer than WinXP, which means even Win Vista is out of the question. On the Mac side version 7 will only install into OS9, it won't work at all on Intel Macs, and it doesn't run very well in Classic mode under OS X, so Adobe's best recommendation on the Mac is to run it on a Mac that can natively boot in OS9.


Typo Boy - Apr 09, 2011 12:59:38 pm PDT #16461 of 25501
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.

And pagemaker is not even cheaper than other options. Several people have told me the goto DTP for someone who needs power, but does not know what they are doing is Indesign. Don't know what someone who does know what they are doing would use that is different. If you can live without DTP power there are cheaper options depending on what you can do without. As my book pulls into homestretch, I'm look at self-publishing a graphic version as an accompaniment. (Publisher is fine with this, wrote permission in contract.) There are all sorts of $30 to $100 DTP things out there. The problem is that I don't really know what I need. Also, while I'm going to do a rough draft to save money, ultimately if I self publish I'll have to turn to pay a professional to turn into into a decent quality work. That is I'll select the graphics, but I'll need someone to look it over and tell me which graphic are good, which I need to replace. And then the professional will need to use photoshop polish up the graphics. And while I'll decide which text goes with which graphic and where I want to keep stuff on the same page, or same two facing pages, layout should be done by someone who knows what they are doing - both in the macro sense (choosing fonts and making layout decisions for the whole book) and micro (doing page by page layout). 190-250 pages mostly graphics 10,000 words at most maybe less. Don't know a professional will charge for that kind of work. Maybe out of my range but I'm hoping that since I'll be supplying graphics and copy-edited text, that it won't be an impossible figure. Since I'm asking for some decision making (macro layout and critiquing graphic choices) and also photo editing where necessary I don't know if what I'm asking for is considered layout or general DTP or maybe layout+graphic editing or what that would be classified as. I mean maybe I don't need a DTP at all. If I'm going to use a professional anyway, maybe I just give them a word file with square brackets saying "insert graphic so and so here" along with all the graphics, and little notes telling them what I want kept together on pages. And they don't have screwups on my part of fix. They edit graphics if needed (beyond sizing I mean). Maybe I use Powerpoint to show when I want graphics and text combined in a very specific way, but still give them the raw files to implement what I want more professionally than I can.

Don't know how big a job this would be. Maybe it would be easier for whoever I hire if I made a mockup of the book with a low-cost DTP package. So in addition to specifications and raw files, they would end up with a pdf that is too low quality to take any images from, but that would be a poorly implemented version of the book to look at if they had questions about what I had in mind. As long as we made it clear that the point is to show where multiple images are to be combined into a single image and what I'm trying to convey, and what text goes with what image, and what combined text and image goes on what page, and that I still expect a much better layout than the example. The one danger of providing a low quality example is that professional might produce something that looked too much like the example.


Liese S. - Apr 09, 2011 1:16:54 pm PDT #16462 of 25501
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."

I use InDesign and it works great. It does have a learning curve, but it's pretty small. I like it a lot, and it's pretty easy to come up with a professional looking layout. It also makes it simple to collaborate with my graphic designer, since she's already using Adobe.


Typo Boy - Apr 09, 2011 1:29:13 pm PDT #16463 of 25501
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.

What does a graphic professional cost? There are two learning curves here. I'm confident I could learn InDesign quickly. I'm not confident that would make me a layout person. If I can give a graphics person A) Text in Microsoft Word and seperate graphics and instructions B) A really ugly InDesign file and instructions (maybe with raw text and graphics just in case), would the graphics person find any particular advantage in B over A?


Ginger - Apr 09, 2011 2:02:32 pm PDT #16464 of 25501
"It didn't taste good. It tasted soooo horrible. It tasted like....a vodka martini." - Matilda

I'm confident I could learn InDesign quickly. I'm not confident that would make me a layout person.

You are a very smart man. Can I have you cloned?


Typo Boy - Apr 09, 2011 2:24:00 pm PDT #16465 of 25501
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.

Ginger, you do DTP professionally, don't you? And content editing as well?


Liese S. - Apr 09, 2011 2:41:06 pm PDT #16466 of 25501
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."

What does a graphic professional cost?

A lot. But I can't be more specific than that, because mine is free. She's a donor, and is solely responsible for us not looking like complete amateurs.