Oh, thanks, -t. I'm interested to hear his evaluation.
Spike: Or maybe Captain Forehead was feeling a little less special. Didn't like me crashing his exclusive club, another vampire with a soul in the world. Angel: You're not in the world, Casper.
'Just Rewards (2)'
Buffistechnology 3: "Press Some Buttons, See What Happens."
Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!
§ ita § - Feb 23, 2010 7:19:06 am PST #13013 of 25501
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
bon bon - Feb 23, 2010 8:18:54 am PST #13014 of 25501
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
We have a 32" and would go bigger. To me it's not big enough for HDTV and Blu-Ray. You're paying for it but not seeing the details anyway.
Typo Boy - Feb 23, 2010 8:38:26 am PST #13015 of 25501
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.
TB, do you require an online reader?
Now that I think about it, no. I take it an "offline" reader would be like an email client? It downloads stuff. Cause, Yeah that would be better in some ways. Stuff does not get deleted until I delete it? An offline client would be fine if it works better than Google reader.
javachik - Feb 23, 2010 8:39:16 am PST #13016 of 25501
Our wings are not tired.
My problem is that I love large screens for movies, but I loathe huge tv shows. So I went for a 32" and it's perfect for me.
tommyrot - Feb 23, 2010 9:00:50 am PST #13017 of 25501
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
Ahh. You can get an addon for Firefox that will spoof the user agent. I haven't tried it, but here's one: [link]
I just installed this. It works great for Google Reader.
eta: This actually works better than using the mobile url for Reader that I mentioned earlier. With this add-on, Reader functions exactly like it does on my iPod Touch.
Vortex - Feb 23, 2010 9:10:27 am PST #13018 of 25501
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman
We have a 32" and would go bigger. To me it's not big enough for HDTV and Blu-Ray. You're paying for it but not seeing the details anyway.
I'm thinking 42 (or 40 if I go with the samsung, which is where I'm leaning, because I tend to run electronics into the ground)
Tom Scola - Feb 23, 2010 9:11:42 am PST #13019 of 25501
Remember that the frontier of the Rebellion is everywhere. And even the smallest act of insurrection pushes our lines forward.
I got the cheapest 37" LCD I could find four years ago, and already the picture is starting to look splotchy.
Gris - Feb 23, 2010 10:42:41 am PST #13020 of 25501
Hey. New board.
We have a 32" and would go bigger. To me it's not big enough for HDTV and Blu-Ray.
Really? That's my size, and I can definitely tell a big difference between Blu-Rays and DVDs, and even more difference between SDTV and HDTV.
Of course, in my living room I'm never more than 6 feet from the TV, so much bigger would require me to be constantly moving my head from side to side. Yay NYC.
javachik - Feb 23, 2010 10:46:46 am PST #13021 of 25501
Our wings are not tired.
Really? That's my size, and I can definitely tell a big difference between Blu-Rays and DVDs, and even more difference between SDTV and HDTV.
My experience as well.
NoiseDesign - Feb 23, 2010 11:37:09 am PST #13022 of 25501
Our wings are not tired
Thanks! The Samsung isn't that much more expensive, but the choices are 40" and 52", a big difference.
Samsung makes 46" panels as well. The difference in viewable area between 40" and 42" isn't really all that much. I have a couple of 40" sets in the studio and they are quite nice.