Thanks, Gud. I was going off one commenter's note that it took 20-30 minutes for 50 GB. I don't know how fast or slow that is. Now that I think about it, that may be faster than my current setup, which seems to take almost that long for half the data.
Plus bonus points for use of the word 'mosey'.
Oz ,'Same Time, Same Place'
Buffistechnology 3: "Press Some Buttons, See What Happens."
Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!
Polter-Cow - Nov 23, 2009 11:02:35 am PST #11779 of 25501
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!
Dana - Nov 23, 2009 11:47:13 am PST #11780 of 25501
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
tommyrot - Nov 23, 2009 11:49:08 am PST #11781 of 25501
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
It loads, but the formatting is very rudimentary - almost everything is on the left side of the screen. (Well, the top 2/3 of the page, anyway.)
Dana - Nov 23, 2009 11:49:53 am PST #11782 of 25501
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
Like, perhaps, the style sheet isn't loading?
tommyrot - Nov 23, 2009 11:50:30 am PST #11783 of 25501
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
Yeah, that's what I was thinking.
The page looks totally different (and better) in IE7.
Polter-Cow - Nov 23, 2009 11:50:43 am PST #11784 of 25501
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!
I get the same as tommyrot. So I think the answer is that it loads, but not correctly.
And, yep, it looks fine in IE.
Typo Boy - Nov 23, 2009 11:51:06 am PST #11785 of 25501
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.
What Tommyrot said.
Dana - Nov 23, 2009 11:51:10 am PST #11786 of 25501
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
Is it common for something to work in IE but not Firefox?
Vortex - Nov 23, 2009 11:52:34 am PST #11787 of 25501
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman
Dana, I suspect not. I'm getting: [no link! nothing to see here!]
§ ita § - Nov 23, 2009 11:52:51 am PST #11788 of 25501
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Is it common for something to work in IE but not Firefox?
Our sites here at work are validated for IE and not Firefox, and that's without any ActiveX shenanigans. I'd have thought it'd be the more standards compliant way around, but I guess you pick your lexicon and work to it.