Willow: Were there dolphins? Tara: Yes. Many dolphins at the pound. Willow: Was there a camel? Tara: There was the front of a camel. A half-camel.

'Selfless'


Spike's Bitches 33: Weeping, crawling, blaming everybody else  

[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.


Jessica - Dec 19, 2006 4:54:27 am PST #6365 of 10004
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

If you look at the great apes, the dimorphism is greater is 50%. The males have harems and no other males are allowed to breed with the females. Humans exhibit around 15% dimorphism, we are situationally monogamous. A nice in-between are chimpanzees who have about 25% dimorphism. While they don't have harems, there is an alpha male who is given the first opportunity to breed with all females as they come into estrus, but there's a lot of fooling around on the side with the non-alphas.

There have also been studies which show very strong correlations between primate testicle size and monogamy (smaller balls relative to male body size = more monogamous, IIRC), and on those, humans fall somewhere in the middle.


Volans - Dec 19, 2006 5:01:54 am PST #6366 of 10004
move out and draw fire

Wow, um, that comparison between the great apes mating patterns and human patterns seems almost like you don't believe in Intelligent Design.

Andi, thanks - he's never been diagnosed with ADHD, but that doesn't mean he doesn't have it. I may give it a read as even if it doesn't help this case, my best friend is ADHD and I'd like to know more.

I was only going to mutter about 5ml being a teaspoon

You know, up until, oh, a year ago, I wouldn't have viscerally understood why you know this conversion, Cindy.

Cash, yuck. My Sunday started off somewhat like that, with Mal up at 6:00 and the cat barfing in the hall. And, for about an hour, I thought it was Monday.


Cashmere - Dec 19, 2006 5:34:22 am PST #6367 of 10004
Now tagless for your comfort.

There have also been studies which show very strong correlations between primate testicle size and monogamy

My friend with the biology major mentioned the testicle thing.

You know, up until, oh, a year ago, I wouldn't have viscerally understood why you know this conversion, Cindy.

Mommy math. It's how I can eyeball four ounces.


Connie Neil - Dec 19, 2006 5:37:19 am PST #6368 of 10004
brillig

Has anyone here ever gone through the process for disability approval? We've been futzing with this for near on 2 years, and we're on our first appeal.

Yesterday we got something that I think is hopeful, a notice of an appointment for Hubby to see a doctor to be evaluated. Granted, the doctor could say, "It's in your head, you could go be a construction worker, get outta here, ya mooch," but being given the appointment does say they think we've got a case, right?


SailAweigh - Dec 19, 2006 5:38:22 am PST #6369 of 10004
Nana korobi, ya oki. (Fall down seven times, stand up eight.) ~Yuzuru Hanyu/Japanese proverb

primate testicle size and monogamy (smaller balls relative to male body size = more monogamous, IIRC), and on those, humans fall somewhere in the middle.

Heh. I remember something about that. Mainly because the book I was reading had side-by-side pictures of man, chimpanzee and ape to compare the testicle size of each. IIRC, men have larger overall testicles than chimps, but they outweigh them by a certain amount so the relative size was more important. I don't remember if the men still won that competition or not. Another factor for monogamy is the helplessness of infants. The more care they require, the more likely the father will be involved because he wants to ensure his progeny survive. There's also factors such as foraging strategies to consider and the relative cost of sperm/egg production, etc. Although, there you're getting more into differences not just between primates, but between all different kinds of animals and invertebrates.

t /anthropology geek


meara - Dec 19, 2006 5:39:36 am PST #6370 of 10004

How do you get outside yourself and judge how you are coming across to people?

I wish I knew, because I've had a variety of "people see me HOW?" situations pop up in my life (and not all in the same way, cause that would be too simple!)

You know, up until, oh, a year ago, I wouldn't have viscerally understood why you know this conversion, Cindy.

I had to think about this for a minute before suddenly remembering being in my bathroom last night, trying to pour out some liquid Tylenol into a tiny cup...


vw bug - Dec 19, 2006 5:56:02 am PST #6371 of 10004
Mostly lurking...

connie, I haven't had to appeal, but when I was doing my original claim, my laywer told me it was very good when they have you go see one of their doctors.

Crossing my fingers for you guys.


Connie Neil - Dec 19, 2006 6:03:12 am PST #6372 of 10004
brillig

We don't have a lawyer yet, Bug. I'm hoping we don't need one. We know one guy whose successful claim to disability is that he has a strange prejudice against personal hygiene and he's only ever worked in food service. I figure if he can get disability, my all-but-crippled Hubby can get it to--once we finish with the damned hoops.


vw bug - Dec 19, 2006 6:04:25 am PST #6373 of 10004
Mostly lurking...

We don't have a lawyer yet, Bug.

You probably don't need one. My parents didn't have the energy to go through all of the paperwork with me, so we went that route.


Cashmere - Dec 19, 2006 6:06:04 am PST #6374 of 10004
Now tagless for your comfort.

connie, good luck. My eldest sister, who is legally blind took a few years to get her claim approved but only after she developed degenerative disc disorder on top of her blindness. It took my brother two years to get SSDI for paranoid schizophrenia after filing his initial claim.

I just know it's not an easy process.