Buffy: A Guide, but no water or food. So it leads me to the sacred place and then a week later it leads you to my bleached bones? Giles: Buffy, really. It takes more than a week to bleach bones.

'Dirty Girls'


Spike's Bitches 33: Weeping, crawling, blaming everybody else  

[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.


Daisy Jane - Nov 07, 2006 2:16:11 pm PST #439 of 10004
"This bar smells like kerosene and stripper tears."

Hee. Mr. Jane is as big a democracy geek as I am. He's got the results and the Daily Show/Colbert Report on the big screen in HD out back of the bar.

I believe I told my boss I was going to try to overthrow the government when I went to vote at lunch.


Steph L. - Nov 07, 2006 2:17:31 pm PST #440 of 10004
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe

He's got the results and the Daily Show/Colbert Report on the big screen in HD out back of the bar.

Wait, Daily Show/Colbert is on already?


DCJensen - Nov 07, 2006 2:19:18 pm PST #441 of 10004
All is well that ends in pizza.

Wait, Daily Show/Colbert is on already?

Election night live coverage, I'll bet.


Daisy Jane - Nov 07, 2006 2:19:33 pm PST #442 of 10004
"This bar smells like kerosene and stripper tears."

No, he's playing that at 10, 11, and 12. I'm sure right now (or in half an hour) it'll be early returns.


JZ - Nov 07, 2006 2:41:25 pm PST #443 of 10004
See? I gave everybody here an opportunity to tell me what a bad person I am and nobody did, because I fuckin' rule.

Re Daniel's link, holy fuck.

I should probably head out to vote in a minute... finally (more or less) worked out how I'll vote, I think, unless I get waffly on some of the eleventy jillion initiatives on the CA ballot once I get to the polling place. I slogged through the enormous voter info book yesterday and came out mostly with a blinding hatred of the initiative process with a side of white-hot loathing for the Taxpayers Protection Society or whoever they are who are also loathed by Sean. I read all the initiatives and want to vote no on everything just to spite everyone, then I read the Taxpayers Whosits' arguments against the initiatives and I want to vote yes on everything just as a fuck you to them.

I'm definitely, absolutely voting no on the sex offenders initiative -- like Sean, I find it comforting to at least pretend that that's not the way we do things in this country. Also, as two different local papers pointed out, the provision that no registered sex offender may live within 2,000 feet of any school or park is severely WTF -- it makes practically every major urban center in the state (you know, all the places with large, solid law enforcement, counseling, rehab, job and housing assistance infrastructures) off-limits to any registered offender and makes them all, without exception, the problem of either rural areas, which will be much more ill equipped to deal with them, or other states.

Fucking whackadoo initiatives and tax asshattery have ruined this state. t /still bitter about having attended public school in post-Prop 13 California


Sparky1 - Nov 07, 2006 3:15:19 pm PST #444 of 10004
Librarian Warlord

As appalling as the sex-offender initiative is (and the abortion one, etc) this year's really appalling initiative on the CA ballot is 90. A friend of mine calls it "our generation's Prop 13."


Sean K - Nov 07, 2006 3:22:10 pm PST #445 of 10004
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

this year's really appalling initiative on the CA ballot is 90.

Voted no!


Daisy Jane - Nov 07, 2006 3:22:50 pm PST #446 of 10004
"This bar smells like kerosene and stripper tears."

What would 90 do?

ETA: (Imma smack the person who says one more thing than 89.)


Sparky1 - Nov 07, 2006 3:30:55 pm PST #447 of 10004
Librarian Warlord

Voted no!

Excellent.

What would 90 do?

From here.

Proposition 90 would amend the California Constitution by requiring the government to pay property owners for economic losses when new laws and rules are enacted that cause a decrease in property value. It would also limit the government's power to take ownership of private property. The measure's requirements would apply to all forms of California government, including city and county governments. Many backers of the proposition oppose the government taking away citizens property without recompense and believe the Prop. 90 will provide regulations to protect property owners. Opposition forces believe Proposition 90 is poorly written and will cost Californians millions when corporate landowners are reimbursed under the measure.


meara - Nov 07, 2006 3:33:49 pm PST #448 of 10004

Skipping ahead, I was assuming the watch-and-post election returns would be in Natter, but apparently they're here?

We're currently bemoaning that NBC and such don't change until 10pm to election coverage, so we're choosing between CNN and Fox News (like that's much of a choice)...