I also suspect that his lawyers are very very sleazy and very very experienced. (And that most 18 year old girls would rather just take the money than appear in court and admit that they were dumb enough to sign onto a GGW video, drunk or not.)
Natter 47: My Brilliance Is Wasted On You People
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I think you also have to reneg on the contract ASAP. I'm not sure that 'after a film embarrasses you' is AS enough.
Now Aimee - it all depends on that person's "no go zones".
I know someone sued Joe Francis, but I think he won. Not clear on how drunk you have to be before you can get out of a contract.
We should totes do the pop culture thing!
Now Aimee - it all depends on that person's "no go zones".
I was impaired when I said that.
but how does the "Girls Gone Wild" guy around it? I have to believe that a lot of those women are less than sober when signing the releases
I've heard he lets people out of the releases if they ask. (I'm trying to remember WHERE I heard it.)
(I'm trying to remember WHERE I heard it.)
You were probably drunk when you heard it.
And, at least according to Wikipedia:
Legally, exposing oneself in a public area constitutes no expectation of privacy; moreover, GGW staff members claim they get every flasher to sign a liability waiver.[1] The legal effect of these factors has resulted in a waiver of some women and girls' rights to bring a civil action against GGW. In 2004 in Panama City, Florida, a judge ruled that video footage of females under the age of 18 exposing their breasts without physical or sexual contact is not child pornography.
You were probably drunk when you heard it.
Hee!
video footage of females under the age of 18 exposing their breasts without physical or sexual contact is not child pornography.
Well then what the hell is it?!?