Mal: Which one you figure tracked us? Zoe: The ugly one, sir. Mal: Could you be more specific?

'Out Of Gas'


Natter 47: My Brilliance Is Wasted On You People  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


billytea - Nov 08, 2006 5:33:04 pm PST #8916 of 10001
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.

And yeah, the dummy is 13, and no one has veto power.

Hi Hil. I'm not terribly familiar with weighted voting as a subject, but given the problem begins with:

If there are four voters, with voting weights of 30, 29, 28, and 13, and if one, and only one, of the voters has veto power

doesn't someone have to have veto power?


Hil R. - Nov 08, 2006 5:40:25 pm PST #8917 of 10001
Sometimes I think I might just move up to Vermont, open a bookstore or a vegan restaurant. Adam Schlesinger, z''l

Oh! You're right! I didn't read the question carefully enough.

So then the voter with 30 votes must be the one with veto power. So that means that billytea was right, the quota has to be at least 71 -- if the voter with 30 votes against it, it won't pass, so that means that the quota must be at least 71. But, on the other hand, if the voters with 30, 28, and 13 each vote for it, and the one with 29 votes against it, there will be 71 votes for it, and since only one voter has veto power, and it's not the one with 29, it must pass. So the quota can't be greater than 71. So it must be exactly 71.

And then in this case, there are no dummy voters. For just one example, if 30, 28, and 13 all vote for it, it'll pass, but if just 30 and 28 do, it won't, so 13 can't be a dummy.


dcp - Nov 08, 2006 5:41:18 pm PST #8918 of 10001
The more I learn, the more I realize how little I know.

and that made me nostalgic and so I googled

I bet you Flickr has some pictures of the place, too, it's amazing what you can find there.

I was telling someone about my trip to Skardu way back when, and one of the anecdotes is about watching a game of polo there, and how the "bleachers" are made of stone, come all the way to the edge of the playing field -- carom passes off the lowest part were allowed -- and I was delighted to find that Flickr has some pix:
[link]
[link] (in the background)
[link]

Looks like the place hasn't changed much in 28 years.


tommyrot - Nov 08, 2006 5:43:07 pm PST #8919 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Brenda, whenever I see the name of your blog, I think there must be a Seuss book with a Brenda Lu Who in it.


Hil R. - Nov 08, 2006 5:43:23 pm PST #8920 of 10001
Sometimes I think I might just move up to Vermont, open a bookstore or a vegan restaurant. Adam Schlesinger, z''l

The local DC news just broke into a commercial break to say that some other stations are reporting that Webb won. It seemed like a rather pointless news break.


Lee - Nov 08, 2006 5:50:08 pm PST #8921 of 10001
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.

EVERYONE SHOULD COME TO NY!

I did that!

Can't people just come to LA?

This too!

YAY for Cover art!

YAY VIRGINIA!


tommyrot - Nov 08, 2006 6:00:41 pm PST #8922 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Gee, I wonder what they're gonna talk about on The Daily Show....


Lee - Nov 08, 2006 6:10:48 pm PST #8923 of 10001
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.

Britney's new hair, and Gee's golden langurs.


brenda m - Nov 08, 2006 6:21:38 pm PST #8924 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

Excellent Top Chef tonight.


tommyrot - Nov 08, 2006 7:12:19 pm PST #8925 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Excellent Dan Savage column on Santorum's defeat: [link]

I'd quote from it, but taking a quote out of context really changes the tone of the piece....