Do I wish I was somebody else right now. Somebody not... married, not madly in love with a beautiful woman who can kill me with her pinkie!

Wash ,'Our Mrs. Reynolds'


Premium Cable: The Cursing Costs Extra

[NAFDA] A thread for the discussion of all original programming on HBO, Showtime, Starz and other premium channels.

This is NOT a general TV discussion thread.


Amy - Apr 09, 2013 6:20:58 am PDT #4928 of 7329
Because books.

There's no question for me that Cersei loves his kids, even --especially -- Joffrey. He's her golden boy/Frankenstein monster. He's just harder to control than she anticipated.


Jessica - Apr 09, 2013 6:23:51 am PDT #4929 of 7329
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

She also tells Sansa "Love no one but your children; in that a mother has no choice." She sees her love for her children as a weakness she's stuck with.

especially -- Joffrey. He's her golden boy/Frankenstein monster

Yep, this.


Sean K - Apr 09, 2013 9:41:02 am PDT #4930 of 7329
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

Where in the show do you see love for Joffrey? I don't see the same kind of concern that I see from Catelyn

I think almost everything Cersei does is out of love for Joffrey. She's not at all affectionate like Catelyn, but I don't see a lack of love for her hideous monster son.


§ ita § - Apr 09, 2013 11:46:47 am PDT #4931 of 7329
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I will respectfully disagree outside of the selfish DNA mentioned above. I don't know what any kind of love would look like on her face, but I don't see her having love for Joffrey as a person, or as the specific son he is. Glory of her heritage and the Lannisters in general, sure. He is indeed her golden boy. But I just don't feel anything personal there, mostly that he is an important piece in her plans and heritage.


Sean K - Apr 09, 2013 2:20:51 pm PDT #4932 of 7329
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

I see your point. I guess I was thinking, "isn't that protecting your DNA thing a (warped) kind of love?" And while, in a way, it might be, I think you might be right that the real answer is, "No, not really." Not for Joffrey as an actual person, rather than a symbol for something else.


Amy - Apr 09, 2013 2:56:32 pm PDT #4933 of 7329
Because books.

I don't think love means the same thing to any five people in one room, to be honest. My definition of loving my kids includes raising them to become kind, responsible, capable people, so Cersei already failed there.

My yardstick is always going to be what the person doing the loving or not believes about the way they feel, and I think if you asked Cersei if she loves Joffrey, she would say absolutely.


§ ita § - Apr 09, 2013 3:03:47 pm PDT #4934 of 7329
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I think if you asked Cersei if she loves Joffrey, she would say absolutely

Too much possibility for unreliable narrator (or even within the framework of the story--fear of death) for me--I read him as her best possible tool to achieve her goals. A tool of her creation, but there's enough fear and understanding of the vile, dangerous, piece of shit that kid is that there's no there there--no cherishing, fondness, warmth, attachment, etc--I don't get those coming off her where Joffrey's concerned.


Amy - Apr 09, 2013 3:11:31 pm PDT #4935 of 7329
Because books.

But that -- "no cherishing, fondness, warmth, attachment" -- might not be what love means to her. And she's really the only person that it matters to -- if I were Sansa, pre-Margery for example, knowing that Cersei loves (or hates) Joffrey isn't going to change how she tries to manipulate him, and what consequences that will have for Sansa.

Ideal love, platonic or maternal or romantic, is supposed to be selfless, but it's very often not. And love is something that I don't think can be strictly defined.

I get that you don't think Cersei loves Joffrey. I just disagree.


§ ita § - Apr 09, 2013 5:18:15 pm PDT #4936 of 7329
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Isn't there a point at which if you diverge to much from the dictionary or general societal understanding of a word, then you've got to use another word in order to usefully communicate?


Amy - Apr 09, 2013 5:35:49 pm PDT #4937 of 7329
Because books.

You saw where I said I disagree with you, right? It's really not that important to me to keep arguing about it. It's opinion, not scientific fact.