They can't be the first five models because D'Anna Biers is/was a three. Assuming that they are numbered as they are made. Perhaps the numbers have nothing to do with chronology.
Boxed Set, Vol. III: "That Can't Be Good..."
A topic for the discussion of Farscape, Smallville, and Due South. Beware possible invasions of Stargate, Highlander, or pretty much any other "genre" show that captures our fancy. Expect Adult Content and discussion of the Big Gay Sex.
Whitefont all unaired in the U.S. ep discussion, identifying it as such, and including the show and ep title in blackfont.
Blackfont is allowed after the show has aired on the east coast.
This is NOT a general TV discussion thread.
What time is the SPN watch & post tonight? And, um, what ep? Because clearly my memory has holes in it. Or I'm a Cylon.
9pm Pacific Time.
Faith?
Yep!
Yay W&P!
I'm a Cylon.
You misspelled bitch.
I mostly disagree with him (for once), but for those who disliked the Galactica finale, and for those who'll get the joke, I must share:
I can only assume we're meant to believe that the Cylons are actually super-evolved forms of iPods. And that next season, they'll discover the Ship of Lights, which, in retrospect, always did look a lot like Apple Stores do now. And they'll meet with Steve Jobs there, who'll talk for 20 minutes about a bunch of shit nobody cares about, and then do his "Oh, and one more thing..." bit and make the surprise announcement of his newest product, the iBlis.
I didn't watch the original BSG, so I didn't get the joke until I read his links, but I read the entry and laughed at much of it, even though I really liked the finale.
I liked this bit:
No word yet on how their devious scheme to refuel a Raptor with booze while taking a memo about having sex with Starbuck will actually play out long-term, but I'm sure it's very sneaky. They're Cylons, after all.
In LiveJournal, fabu discusses an interesting (meta) topic in Squees, rants and everything in between. A sample:
jlh points out that a common cultural assumption is that those who like something have a less examined, less thought-through reaction than those who don't like it. As someone who tends to focus my analysis and thought on things I *like* (if I don't like something, I mostly just lose interest, so I don't spend a lot of time analyzing why it didn't work for me), this assumption really gets my goat.
This is something I've been thinking about a lot, lately. I've yet to read any of the posts she's linked to. Has anyone else read them, or fabu's post? Thoughts?