There should be more discussion of the verbing of nouns, I think
Least Favourite Ever, from a football junkie? "Audiblise."
What the hell does that mean? Audiblise? That isn't a word.
'Help'
A place for Buffistas to discuss, beta and otherwise deal and dish on their non-fan fiction projects.
There should be more discussion of the verbing of nouns, I think
Least Favourite Ever, from a football junkie? "Audiblise."
What the hell does that mean? Audiblise? That isn't a word.
I loathe "to task," but that's largely because I always picture Former Boss saying it.
So incredibly not a football junkie, I have no idea what "audiblise" means. But it does sound wrong, I'll give you that.
We recently starting saying, "Can you biscuit the dog?" when she comes in from outside, which makes me giggle.
"Can you biscuit the dog?"
Hee!
So incredibly not a football junkie, I have no idea what "audiblise" means
"Calling an audible" is what the quarterback does if he looks at the other team's defense and realises that the play he's got scripted is going to get him trampled. He calls another play, a new one, loud enough for his players to hear. "The quarterback calls an audible."
Nowadays? "The quarterback audiblises." So very very wrong.
Um, why not just use "audible" as the verb?
Um, why not just use "audible" as the verb?
Well, considering that "audible" isn't a verb either? I hate both options.
Whether he "audibles" (not a word or a concept) or "audiblises" (grotesque in its not-a-wordness), it's just wrong.
He calls an audible. I can, in context, allow "audible" as a highly specialised noun. It is not, under any conditions my mind can imagine, acceptable as a verb.
You need to broadenilise your horizons.
You need to broadenilise your horizons.
Not as much as you need to horizonalise your broads.
So that's why I'm NGA.