Sorry to break in. X-Post from Firefly...

The editor of the local paper tracked me down via local academia*. She wants an article on the fan effect on TV-On-DVD, and the effect this revenue stream might have on the creative effort. I've read the Cassutt piece. I'm not sure how a background in chemical engineering helps me, here, but I'm thinking of assailing the piece.

In pursuit of this, I'm soliciting the best numbers available for budgets of shows (google helps not). Also, any anecdote of how fans have influenced the production of series DVDs, and how series DVDs might have influenced the production of … anything, in any medium, would be handy. (Profile addy good.)

• She was looking for an "adult fan" of a TV show. My name came up, pretty quickly.

Thanks (Again, for the interuption, sorry.)

edit: spelling. Gawd, I'm doomed.

Don't forget, you may not have had your story read by the head person. Often 'newbies' get read by a 'first reader'.

Takes a while. Don't give up.

Gus, don't forget the Buffistas who raised money to buy Firefly DVDs for the armed forces.

(yeh, I know that didn't lead to getting them made, but still....)

Gus, if you want to talk about the Farscape campaign, and the (utterly vital) importance of DVDs there, I'm around. Also, of the Buffistas, Mickie and Buggs are excellent sources for Farscape stuff. You can usually find them in the Boxed Set thread.

Anyway, if you want me, in about 2 hours (late for you, I know), I'll be on IM as grendelbabe.

Gah! The Boxed Set thread! What could be more obvious? I am so completely fucking doomed. Thanks, 'Suela.

sfmarty: That one, I got. I made myself so malodorous among that crowd that the subject is seared into my memory. ;)

Some astute observations from Teresa Nielsen-Hayden about slushpiles and rejection. Susan W., pay particular attention, because I think the issues she talks about tend to substantiate that your MS is getting serious professional consideration of the "almost buy" variety.

[link]

Thanks, Theodosia--I've bookmarked that for future reference and to take to my writers group.

And, yeah, it does sound like I'm making it into that top 1-5% with almost everyone who sees my manuscript. Which is not bad at all for a first novel, especially given that now that I'm looking at it after several months away, I can tell I submitted it before it was really ready. The story doesn't really pick up until Chapter Three, for example. And I knew that, and knew it was a strike against me, but I couldn't think of a way around it that would still get in all the backstory I need. Until now, after it's already been seen and rejected by three people. Now it's obvious--open with a dramatic incident currently in Ch. 3, flashback, flashback, a few dialogue explanations, and Bob's your uncle. Oops. From now on I'm going to do that thing all the books suggest where you set the manuscript aside for a month or two and give it one more edit before you submit. And I knew I should do that too, but I was afraid the contacts I'd made in early fall would go stale. Oh well.

That's a fascinating article.

Yeah, it really was. I have gotten many "nice" rejections...the rejected part still hurt though, but I have to join her in being boggled at the not-poem recognizing poet, and the one that got hurt because the total love letter rejection was not (quite) an acceptance.

Yeah, I can't imagine reacting that way to the gushing love letter reception--being grumpy that I'd had the bad luck to just miss the cut, sure, but encouraged all the same, and I'd have had that manuscript back out the door as fast as I could get to the post office.

(I didn't recognize the poem immediately, either, but I'm not a poet and almost never read modern poetry.)