Jayne: That's a good idea. Good idea. Tell us where the stuff's at so I can shoot you. Mal: Point of interest? Offering to shoot us might not work so well as an incentive as you might imagine.

'Out Of Gas'


Natter 46: The FIGHTIN' 46  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


tommyrot - Sep 22, 2006 7:31:23 am PDT #9630 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Five Tips to Increase Your Likeability

In summary,

  • Be positive.
  • Control you insecurities.
  • Provide value.
  • Eliminate all judgements.
  • Become a person of conviction.

Ah, fuck it. That's too much work. Plus they left out my favorite: "Reject others before they reject you."


tommyrot - Sep 22, 2006 7:37:16 am PDT #9631 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

For aviation geeks:

"Though it's not being widely reported, this week marks the end of the line for the F-14 Tomcat in US Navy service. First flown in 1970, the Grumman F-14 Tomcat was easily one of the world's most powerful, advanced, and deadly aircraft for many years, capable of flying at Mach 2.3 and firing its half-dozen Mach 5 AIM-54 Phoenix air-to-air missiles at targets as much as 100 miles away. Having been gradually replaced during the last several years by the newer F/A-18E/F, the last of the aircraft in US service will be officially retired on Friday, September 22nd in a ceremony at Virginia's Oceana Naval Air Station. However, at least a few F-14s will continue to fly for a few more years: Iran — which took delivery of 79 aircraft before the overthrow of the Shah — still flies the plane, though only a small number (perhaps ten or twenty) are believed to still be in service due to a lack of spare parts and attrition."

So if we attack Iran, we may have to fight Tomcats....

[link]

More details: [link]


Nutty - Sep 22, 2006 7:39:14 am PDT #9632 of 10001
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

But, Nutty, then you get a closet full of pieces of clothing of different "sizes" if the garment's waist hits me in different places.

Better to be in the ballpark, though, right? By using inches (or cm) at least we know that apples are compared to other fruits, and not to lawn chairs or scissors or rhesus monkeys. Also, makes it harder for size-drift to occur.

And anyway, one presumes that the cut of the garment would be reflected in the number of measurements, right? So I couldn't just walk in and buy a 29" waist pair of jeans; I'd buy 29" waist, 33" inseam, 40" rise, 36" hip jeans. (Totally making those figures up.) By looking at the combination of rise, hip, and waist, you'd be better able to predict just by reading which jeans are totally outside the scope of try-on-able and which might actually turn out to work.

Also, that kind of variety takes care of the variations of hip/waist ratio and butt bubbliness. We already get choiced for inseam (at LLBean anyway); why not more shape-variant measurements to work with?

This message brought to you by that experience where you get a thing into the dressing room, and when it is halfway up your legs realize that you cannot get the hips portion over your knees.


flea - Sep 22, 2006 7:43:04 am PDT #9633 of 10001
information libertarian

Seaking of, Butty, did thos pants fit?

I am leaving the typos, because they are craking me up.

Yes, folks, this is how my first draft of everything looks.


SailAweigh - Sep 22, 2006 7:50:56 am PDT #9634 of 10001
Nana korobi, ya oki. (Fall down seven times, stand up eight.) ~Yuzuru Hanyu/Japanese proverb

So if we attack Iran, we may have to fight Tomcats....

Tommy, even when we gave those planes to Iran, they were all stripped of any advanced technology for the time. There were Iranians going to avionics school with my ex and me that had to leave the class when certain types of equipment were taught. Meant they didn't have to take the tests on them, either, lucky schmucks.


Theodosia - Sep 22, 2006 7:53:37 am PDT #9635 of 10001
'we all walk this earth feeling we are frauds. The trick is to be grateful and hope the caper doesn't end any time soon"

"Hairy" many-many-legged large-ish bugs may well be House Centipedes, which eat silverfish, cockroaches, and other undesirables. They are not particularly harmful to humans and household pets, having a mild venom at best, though they may be quite amusing to cats.

Details: [link]


tommyrot - Sep 22, 2006 7:53:42 am PDT #9636 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Tommy, even when we gave those planes to Iran, they were all stripped of any advanced technology for the time.

Supposedly the Iranians have been upgrading them with their own technology. But this is obvioulsy hard to confirm.


Sean K - Sep 22, 2006 7:57:51 am PDT #9637 of 10001
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

millions without direct access to health care,

This is my nightmare, lately.


tommyrot - Sep 22, 2006 7:58:43 am PDT #9638 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Oh, so apparantly the administration and the military are still considering nuking Iran.

::looks for a place to throw up::

[link]

The Pentagon's top brass has moved into second-stage contingency planning for a potential military strike on Iran, one senior intelligence official familiar with the plans tells RAW STORY.

The official, who is close to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the highest ranking officials of each branch of the US military, says the Chiefs have started what is called "branches and sequels" contingency planning.

"The JCS has accepted the inevitable," the intelligence official said, "and is engaged in serious contingency planning to deal with the worst case scenarios that the intelligence community has been painting."


§ ita § - Sep 22, 2006 8:04:40 am PDT #9639 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

why not more shape-variant measurements to work with?

Because I'd need to travel with a notebook just to remember all my shapes.

Honestly, I think it's annoying that a 6 isn't a 6 isn't a 6. But if they were dressing approximately the same woman, I wouldn't mind so much.

I did an eBay binge a month or so ago. For that time I was totally on top of my waist/hip/bust measurements. Then I realised that I needed to know shoulder to waist--natural waist for the older stuff. Then there are the issues where having breasts makes a natural-waist outfit an empire cut on me. Or the fact that it's not just my hips that take up the space, but my thighs.

I tried the multiple measurement thing. It has sufficient limitations that I'm not sold on it at all.