Thanks for the rec, Lee!
Natter 46: The FIGHTIN' 46
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
She's wearing a see-through dress so you don't have tpo ask if she has fake breasts, obviously!
Thanks for the rec, Lee!
You're welcome. The more that I think about it, the surer I am that she doesn't cover your area, but I bet she might have a rec or two.
ita, do you have this picture in wet men? [link]
not ita, but I believe she does, or something similar.
I also believe the same can be said for my screen saver shots.
Okey doke. I keep losing the link for provocatuse (or however you spell it) so i couldn't check.
Please to keep doing so.
(It means we get to look)
Mmmm... I had that picture as my wallpaper for a really long time.
I just got an email from my new boss with "LOL" in it. Um.
Cindy, I'm sure lots of people actively interpret the Bible and think about context and metaphors and so on. I have trouble with the idea that those people are incapable of doing the same thing to interpret a survey question.
If you ask people if God created human beings within the last 10,000 years, 40-45% say yes. That's been consistent for almost 20 years. ABC News did a survey in 2004 where they asked about specific events in the Bible, and whether they were "literally true, meaning it happened that way word-for-word, or meant as a lesson, but not to be taken literally?" They asked about Moses parting the Red Sea, the story of Noah and the flood, and the world's creation in 6 days. All three were described as "literally true" by over 60% of the respondents.
The fact that the numbers go up when you get more specific makes me think that people understand what they're being asked.
RE Jessica Simpson - still not as bad as the Dian Cannon pic on Go Fug Yourself today.