The next time you decide to stab me in the back... have the guts to do it to my face.

Mal ,'Ariel'


Natter 46: The FIGHTIN' 46  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


tommyrot - Aug 08, 2006 3:59:41 pm PDT #1513 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

More math fun:

I was taking calculus. I was a mathematics major and I was at a Christian college that was called Christian, but was not Christian....

I asked a question to my calculus professor: “What makes this course distinctly Christian?” He stopped. He said no one has ever asked that question before...

He said, “Okay, I'm a Christian; you're a Christian.”

I said, “That's not what I asked! What makes this calculus course distinctly Christian? What makes this different from the local secular university? Are we using the same text? Yes. Are you teaching it the same way? Yes. Then why is this called a Christian college and that one a non-Christian college?”

eta [link]

eta²:

The good Christian should beware the mathematician and all those who make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that the mathematicians have made a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and to confine man in the bonds of hell.

-St Augustine


Zenkitty - Aug 08, 2006 4:11:43 pm PDT #1514 of 10001
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

Was St Augustine using the same definition of "mathematician" that I am?

I can't even follow what Jehle is saying in that quote. I gave up and remain happily pagan. Or am I heathen? I can never remember.


billytea - Aug 08, 2006 4:13:32 pm PDT #1515 of 10001
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.

Was St Augustine using the same definition of "mathematician" that I am?

I fervently and enthusiastically hope so.


Strega - Aug 08, 2006 4:15:01 pm PDT #1516 of 10001

Okay, It's built on Hinduism. Let's look at all the Islamic countries over in Europe.

Ow ow ow ow ow ow ow.


tommyrot - Aug 08, 2006 4:15:30 pm PDT #1517 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

I can't even follow what Jehle is saying in that quote.

Another blogger said this:

Every august, James Kennedy - a thoroughly repulsive ultra-fundy preacher from Coral Ridge Ministries - runs a conference called "Reclaiming America for Christ". At this years conference, he featured a speech by Paul Jehle about "Evaluating your Philosophy of Education".

Jehle is... umm... how do we say this politely?....

Ah, screw it. Jehle is a fucking frothing at the mouth nutjob lunatic asshole.

His basic argument - the argument that he expects people to take seriously - is that everything is either christian or non-christian. And if it's non-christian, then christians shouldn't look at it, listen to it, or study it. And you can't ever make anything that started out non-christian christian.

then after his quote of Jehle (that I quoted in my previous post):

Yeah. Seriously. Math is Bad, because it's not explicitly christian. I mean, it uses zero, which was invented by a hindu, and brought to europe by muslims. Algebra was invented by muslims! The word "algorithm" comes from the name of a muslim mathematician!

Uh-oh... I just realized that the alleged "Doctor" Jehle has a very serious problem. The way that we geeks heard his talk to write about it is because it was digitized - using a thoroughly non-christian technology - and posted on the internet, which is built using those non-christian algorithms. And to quite Jehle himself:

But the issue is you cannot combine something by its nature which is pagan and built on humanistic principles and make it Christian by a magic wand.

So the internet, and computers, and digital recording, and the data compression that makes streaming audio work - they're non-christian. And you cannot combine something non-Christian with something Christian.

[link]


amych - Aug 08, 2006 4:19:43 pm PDT #1518 of 10001
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

And you can't ever make anything that started out non-christian christian.

Damn. Not even, say, St. Paul?


tommyrot - Aug 08, 2006 4:21:15 pm PDT #1519 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

I can't help myself:

Differentiation is an operator on functions that takes one functions and transforms it into another form. The new form is related to the old form--the derivative tells interesting information about how the original function behaves graphically--but it is a completely new function. When someone accepts Jesus as Lord of their life and gives themselves wholly to God as one of His creatures, a similar transformation occurs."

...

"Once a person has been called to be a Christian, we are redeemed by Christ but not released from following the law of God. We are justified once but continue with the process of sanctification for the remainder of our lives. This sanctification process is like the limit process of the secant lines approaching the tangent line."

[link]


aurelia - Aug 08, 2006 4:21:49 pm PDT #1520 of 10001
All sorrows can be borne if you put them into a story. Tell me a story.

So the internet, and computers, and digital recording, and the data compression that makes streaming audio work - they're non-christian. And you cannot combine something non-Christian with something Christian.

If that includes amps, electric guitars and whatnot do they have to take back Stryper?


Zenkitty - Aug 08, 2006 4:24:01 pm PDT #1521 of 10001
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

Wait, if mathematics is non-Christian, how can he justify explaining Christianity using math as his metaphor?


tommyrot - Aug 08, 2006 4:24:43 pm PDT #1522 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

If that includes amps, electric guitars and whatnot do they have to take back Stryper?

Heh.

Didn't Stryper abandon Christian rock for, um... secular rock? Or am I thinking of some other Christian band?