'Beneath You'
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
areligious is the word I would use. even though I have no real belief in god ( or even nonbelief) , i have views of the world that can be seen as spiritual - so i tend to use the word areligious.
ION , a huge tree limb just fell off the tree at the end of the driveway. it is half blocking my driveway. and it broke one of my garbage bins.
Huh. Guess I'm a weak atheist.
Oh yeah, there's a proud identification.
I can't find areligious in m-w.com. I use the word, but more to signify my not caring.
I've prefer the term agnostic. - because somewhere along the line i read a definition that said something along the line that the question - does god exsist or not exsist is not an important question. and to me it really isn't.
I have a friend who's a hard athiest (and a bit annoyingly prostletyzey, so I tend to avoid the subject with him) who believes in ghosts. I see this as an inconsistency. He, obviously, does not.
Thanks, beth. I still think non-practicing is closest, since areligious doesn't touch on belief.
I have a friend who's a hard athiest (and a bit annoyingly prostletyzey, so I tend to avoid the subject with him) who believes in ghosts. I see this as an inconsistency. He, obviously, does not.
I'd see that as an inconsistency, too.
How so? What do ghosts have to do with God?
How so? What do ghosts have to do with God?
It seems to me that once you believe in the supernatural it seems silly to declare God an impossibility.