We've too many people already, and I don't think we are psyhologically or socially set up for that.
There'ssomanyofusthere'ssomanyofusthere'ssomany there'ssomanyofusthere'ssomanyofusthere'ssomany LET'S HAVE A WAR!
::ahem::
Sorry. Just letting my inner punk show for a second. But yes, I'm right there with you, Raq. Overpopulation is the big white elephant in the room that looms (Hi Pete!) over pretty much all other impending global crises.
Hmm... I'm maybe not helping.
"I don't believe there's any issue that's more important than this one," said Republican Sen. David Vitter.
Sure, I mean it isn't like we're in the middle of a war.
If that's the same guy, Jon Stewart showed a clip of him saying that, and the rest of the quote (shown on the clip) is, in fact, "This is
ten times
more important than the war in Iraq and the global war on terror combined." [emphasis his]
Yay, Tommyrot! It sounds like you either got the real deal or that the cure was to stick a needle in your eye. Are three-dimensional scrambled eggs really an improvement, though?
BOH. Said to be the name of a Danish general, who so terrified his opponent Foh, that he caused him to bewray himself. Whence, when we smell a stink, it is custom to exclaim, Foh! i.e. I smell general Foh. He cannot say Boh to a goose; i.e. he is a cowardly or sheepish fellow. There is a story related of the celebrated Ben Jonson, who always dressed very plain; that being introduced to the presence of a nobleman, the peer, struck by his homely appearance and awkward manner, exclaimed, as if in doubt, "you Ben Johnson! why you look as if you could not say Boh to a goose!" "Boh!" replied the wit.
Umm.... yeah. And I thought the humor in the WWII era Bugs Bunny cartoons was a little over my head.
If that's the same guy, Jon Stewart showed a clip of him saying that, and the rest of the quote (shown on the clip) is, in fact, "This is ten times more important than the war in Iraq and the global war on terror combined."
What I'd really love is for the Dems to take this as an opportunity to shout from the rooftops that the GOP doesn't care about national security. Surely one can win more votes with fear of terrorism than with fear of gay people???
Damn, forgot to set TDS to record.
APE LEADER. An old maid; their punishment after death, for neglecting increase and multiply, will be, it is said, leading apes in hell.
You mean I'll get monkeys?! Suh-weet. Now I'm really never having kids.
Wow...Why do people take Ann Coulter seriously on put her on TV?
[link]
From the Today Show:
LAUER: Do you believe everything in the book or do you put some things in there just to cater to your base?
ANN: No, of course I believe everything.
LAUER: On the 9-11 widows, an in particular a group that had been critical of the administration: “These self-obsessed women seem genuinely unaware that 9-11 was an attack on our nation and acted like as if the terrorist attack only happened to them. They believe the entire country was required to marinate in their exquisite personal agony. Apparently, denouncing bush was part of the closure process.” And this part is the part I really need to talk to you about: “These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by griefparrazies. I have never seen people enjoying their husband’s death so much.” Because they dare to speak out?
COULTER: To speak out using the fact they are widows. This is the left’s doctrine of infallibility. If they have a point to make about the 9-11 commission, about how to fight the war on terrorism, how about sending in somebody we are allowed to respond to. No. No. No. We have to respond to someone who had a family member die. Because then if we respond, oh you are questioning their authenticity.
LAUER: So grieve but grieve quietly?
COULTER: No, the story is an attack on the nation. That requires a foreign policy response.
LAUER: By the way, they also criticized the Clinton administration.
COULTER: Not the ones I am talking about. No, no, no.
LAUER: Yeah they have.
COULTER: Oh no, no, no, no, no. They were cutting commercials for Kerry. They were using their grief to make a political point while preventing anyone from responding.
LAUER: So if you lose a husband, you no longer have the right to have a political point of view?
COULTER: No, but don’t use the fact that you lost a husband as the basis for being able to talk about, while preventing people from responding. Let Matt Lauer make the point. Let Bill Clinton make the point. Don’t put up someone I am not allowed to respond to without questioning the authenticity of their grief.
LAUER: Well apparently you are allowed to respond to them.
COULTER: Yeah, I did.
LAUER: So, in other words.
COULTER: That is the point of liberal infallibility. Of putting up Cindy Sheehan, of putting out these widows, of putting out Joe Wilson. No, no, no. You can’t respond. It’s their doctrine of infallibility. Have someone else make the argument then.
LAUER: What I’m saying is I don’t think they have ever told you, you can’t respond.
COULTER: Look, you are getting testy with me.
LAUER: No. I think it’s a dramatic statement. “These broads are millionaires stalked by stalked by grief-parazzies”? “I have never seen people enjoying their husband’s deaths so much”?
COULTER: Yes, they are all over the news.
LAUER: The book is called “Godless: The Church of Liberalism.” Ann Coulter, always fun to have you here.
LAUER: No. I think it’s a dramatic statement. “These broads are millionaires stalked by stalked by grief-parazzies”? “I have never seen people enjoying their husband’s deaths so much”?
COULTER: Yes, they are all over the news.
Jesus, she makes me want to scream. And hurl things. And hope she dies bloody. One of our best friends died in the Towers, and his widow isn't "enjoying" his death at all. Nor are his two children, one of who never got to meet him.
I know all of the slang terms used so far from my reading of Georgette Heyer (the original regency romance novelist), who clearly owned a copy of the volume in question.
