Mal: Gotta say, doctor, your talent for alienatin' folk is near miraculous. Simon: Yes, I'm very proud.

'Safe'


Natter 45: Smooth as Billy Dee Williams.  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


§ ita § - Jul 07, 2006 11:00:21 am PDT #5809 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Running Scared was just sad. How can you improve on Gregory Hines, Billy Crystal, and Joey Pants with a parakeet on his head? You can't. They shouldn't have tried.

They tried? When? Wait...it wasn't a TV show.


Kalshane - Jul 07, 2006 11:00:54 am PDT #5810 of 10002
GS: If you had to choose between kicking evil in the head or the behind, which would you choose, and why? Minsc: I'm not sure I understand the question. I have two feet, do I not? You do not take a small plate when the feast of evil welcomes seconds.

Running Scared was just sad. How can you improve on Gregory Hines, Billy Crystal, and Joey Pants with a parakeet on his head? You can't. They shouldn't have tried.

Sadly, the only part about that movie I remember is when they park their car in a bad neighborhood and come back to discover someone has spray-painted "Undercover Cop Car" on it. (If I'm even remembering the right movie). Though it still makes me laugh.


Toddson - Jul 07, 2006 11:04:54 am PDT #5811 of 10002
Friends don't let friends read "Atlas Shrugged"

Yes, it (making old TV shows into movies) CAN work, but they seem to keep missing what about the show made it good, or at least popular, when it was on. And they keep "reinventing" it until it's unrecognizable, so that it'll have only a thin, superficial, resemblance to the original.


§ ita § - Jul 07, 2006 11:05:03 am PDT #5812 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I think they recycle because there are only so many to go around. IMDB finds me dupes on searches way more often than I expect.

Running Scared, a la Hines/Crystal is a great great movie. Huh. Now I'm looking at that slash there.

I think Eminem looks like he has decent chops. I don't know the source material though, and would be startled if he could pull off what's been described here.

Though, hey, I was startled to like 8 Mile, so there you go.


P.M. Marc - Jul 07, 2006 11:05:53 am PDT #5813 of 10002
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

They must be planning a complete "revisioning."

IIRC, yes. And it actually sounds interesting.

Also, while there's the head-start on account of the semi-autobiographical nature of the movie, the boy kicked all kinds of ass in 8 Mile.


§ ita § - Jul 07, 2006 11:07:03 am PDT #5814 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Speaking of--from today's IMDB:

The BBC's comedy unit and its movie unit are reportedly working together to produce theatrical motion pictures based on the publicly supported broadcaster's hit sitcoms. The BBC website said today that Kenton Allen, creative head of BBC Comedy Talent, is heading up a scheme that, in Allen's words, would allow its comedy stars "to paint on a bigger canvas." Among the shows reportedly being considered for a big-screen version is The Office, starring Ricky Gervais. An American version of the show, starring Steve Carell in the Gervais role, currently airs on NBC. The BBC has a long history of producing theatrical films, but most have not been distributed outside the U.K.


Toddson - Jul 07, 2006 11:07:45 am PDT #5815 of 10002
Friends don't let friends read "Atlas Shrugged"

Last night megan walker and I were talking about American remakes of French comedies, which are usually - at best - crap. If they're going to reinvent it - new actors, new concepts to appeal to a new generation - why not use it as a jumping-off point and do it fresh, instead of trying for some kind of nostalgic appeal?


§ ita § - Jul 07, 2006 11:10:14 am PDT #5816 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

why not use it as a jumping-off point and do it fresh, instead of trying for some kind of nostalgic appeal?

I think The Brady Bunch (which I never saw) succeeded with nostalgia--it seemed to be liked. As for Starsky & Hutch, it was both, kinda. Nostalgia tuned with looking back and mocking ourselves. It just wasn't in the same genre as the original, which I think pissed many off.


Fred Pete - Jul 07, 2006 11:20:22 am PDT #5817 of 10002
Ann, that's a ferret.

BB might have worked if it had been set at the time of the original series. But making them an early-'70s style family in the early '90s made it "watch from the hall" fodder. Which really isn't what you want on a plane.


bon bon - Jul 07, 2006 11:20:44 am PDT #5818 of 10002
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

The Brady Bunch was quite good, I thought. Very sly, and not a straight-up remake. I mean, the bell bottoms are the point-- those people are transplanted into the nineties, which made them complete dorks.