Dana's new haircut is so radical, it's forbidden.

Huh. Stupid livejournal.

And the husband is home, so now it will have to wait. Oops.

Dana is a haircut tease and taunter!

I have to write a cover letter. Don't wanna!

Where's Dana's hair at??

In news about me, I had a great meeting at work today. First, I let someone else give "our" weekly update, but the fact was, I could have done it -- it was all stuff I knew. So that was good. Then, someone else was talking about someone in a different company who had done something fairly stupid, but she said, "But she's brand new -- I think she's only been there six weeks." I feel incredibly on top of things, all things considered.

I saw the pictures of Dana's hair! I have no idea why it worked for me. Maybe you had to be logged in to lj?

ETA:

Where's Dana's hair at??

Deleted now. I'm sure she'll repost later with working links.

I am very sad that I missed Dana's hair pic.

My new temp office actually has some advantages over the old one. It will probably have several more, once I am forced to tear the vocal cords out of my neighbor, who likes to talk very loudly on the phone, and calls the people he is talking to "dude" a lot. (this is the same paralegal who has problems conveying assignments in a timely fashion.)

So I have someone who wrote a pretty good paper, but whose references page contains the information that she searched for the subject on Yahoo, clicked on a bunch of links, and gathered information from various sites. How do I concisely but clearly explain why that's not really enough of a bibliography, even for such an informal paper?

Dana, when you go to wring out your hair, be prepared for it to end abruptly so you don't do what I did and nearly fall down in the shower and walk around with aching shoulders and a banged elbow for several days. (want to see pictures too!)

"Wow! What did you do to your elbow?!" I washed my hair.

I'm a big dork. The lights in the stairwell aren't on. So I go down and fiddle with the timer. After much fiddling, I ascertain it must be electrical beyond my talents, because the breaker keeps popping. Which I'll tell the office and they'll look at me like I have three heads because I tinkered. Ah well.

Typo, as I read that, I was reminded that in NM elections, if it is determined to be a tie, the tie breaker can be ANY method the parties (or the governing org, I don't recall) agree to. This came up in the 2000 elections. I found it...well, I pictured old west gunslingers if you must know, because it's so typical of my home state.

I am about to eat a Libido Burrito.

Should I be scared?

So I have someone who wrote a pretty good paper, but whose references page contains the information that she searched for the subject on Yahoo, clicked on a bunch of links, and gathered information from various sites. How do I concisely but clearly explain why that's not really enough of a bibliography, even for such an informal paper?

This is not a case of simply using on-line sources? She just did a yahoo search and that is all she said? She did not even list individual sources?