Sorry. Didn't mean to be a PITA. For me the date will determine where and if I can go, so I wouldn't want to vote on a place without knowing it.
I'm not trying to be pesky either... I just (half) remember a conversation about going place first so places could pick dates that work well for them specifically. Like, if we're in the south not so late toward the summer, etc.
Just trying to figure out what's helpful for analysing data.
In other news, looking at Jessica's links has made me hungry.
I'll do both. In the meantime...
- NY Perks (jazz lounge, wine/martini bar)
- Dashing Diva (the nail place I couldn't remember the name of earlier)
- Chestnut - best brunch in town
Jiminy! From the brunch place: "Poached eggs, popovers, proscuitto & hollandaise" and "Salt cod hash & roasted egg"
The logic on date-first was that only those people whose schedules would allow them to come on the chosen date would vote on city.
We don't need a quorum, so you don't need to vote present.
On the vote, I would strongly urge a preferential aspect for those you can attend, with no vote for dates you can't attend.
The only date that DOESN'T work for me is June 22-24, as Lea will likely be away at grad school.
I like the idea of either city; both places have things to do (for me, both fun stuff and professional stuff), people I care about, etc. And it's pretty much equal in flight times and costs.