That's not a regular gig, though, is it? Just a recurring role or something like that?

Unsure. The article I read didn't say.

Mmm... vague.... t /Homer

"I am sure Tim will be fine. I'm sure Tim won't be writing Touched by an Angel. I am sure that Tim doesn't think that Christians/Jews/Buddhists/Muslims own god and all known subsidiaries thereof. I am sure that Tim won't preach morals at you. I am sure that the fox network is not the fox studio. I am sure that the sky is not falling."

Puh-lease. Has anyone seen anything he's written or read any of his interviews? I didn't like Touched by a Highway to Heaven either, but this show looks like it will absolutely ROCK. I mean, anyone who could write The Beagle Killer on Buffy, could never mess this one up.

Oh, and by the way, I love Cindy. Love.

And, I would not hate having Nathan Fillion on this show. Nope, I could live with that ok. Not saying he has time or inclination or anything. Just that it would make me happy. And since this show is clearly all about making me and Cindy happy...

I'm sure Tim won't be writing Touched by an Angel.

From the sound of it, he won't be rehashing Angel either.

I like the premise, it seems like it would be lighter in tone than Drive or The Inside.

So, this is what happens when I get a job. I should be unemployed more often if it means we get new Tim shows. I know I'm going to enjoy this one. It sounds like it can bring both the funny and the pain in heaping helpings.

Congratulations, Tim!

I had a dream about Nathan Fillion last night. He slapped me on the ass. That means that he's going to be in Tim's new show, right?

Johanna would like me to remind Tim that if he'd had a monkey on Drive things would have gone very differently. So just remember that the miracles should involve monkeys. It's important.

Daniel is working on a pitch that involves pirates. And he is at this moment on the phone telling me how good Firefly was, and I'm not hanging up on him. Despite my better judgment.

Johanna would like me to remind Tim that if he'd had a monkey on Drive things would have gone very differently. So just remember that the miracles should involve monkeys. It's important.

Make it monkeys on ice, and you get to take over the WORLD!!!

Johanna would like me to remind Tim that if he'd had a monkey on Drive things would have gone very differently.

Wonderfalls had a monkey, and it also only got to air 4 hours. IJS.

there's this faithless scam artist bilking old ladies out of their retirement money with smoke-and-mirror "miracles," and god's sense of humor is to give the dude the ability to perform miracles...but only when no one is around to witness it, and in such a way that it's just a hair over onto the ambiguous side so the event could be Scully-ed... Except he's never entirely sure it's a miracle or an accident, because he has no faith.

I have no idea if this is exactly the concept or not, but what you describe reads just brilliant to me.

Now, I do realize that I come to the whole question of religion from a completely different angle, not even because of who I am, what I believe in and what I do on my daily life, but mainly because of what I'm not.

I'm not an American, I have no clear idea regarding the actual day-to-day part religion plays in people's lives, and the different streams and ways-of-thought and practice that come into play. I don't know what stresses and pressures it causes in different communities, how the differences are being fought-over and settled. I don't really know how religion is being milked for money or power or any-other-thing in the USA. Pretty much, I only know that even what I know of my own religion is different across the ocean. So I don't really know anything about *that*, too.

Religion is a very tricky business here, what with the connection to local and somewhat wider politics, the friction between groups with a different set of beliefs and so forth. And that's just between the Jewish citizens of Israel, among themselves, without even putting the Islam or Christianity into the mix (and with Jerusalem, you kinda have to).

But the discussions and arguments about the whole topic, despite their turning-into-a-shouting-match potential, are always fascinating, to me. I mean, the very topic of what you mentioned, miracle-or-accident, interests me in so many levels. I love it that the interpretation of the event can always be left to the observer, that the way your thoughts about the matter have already been beforehand is pretty much what determines the way you're going to see whatever comes next.

I also love it that even if it is just a series-of-events which have a low statistic probability, you can still claim that the place in which their took place, their timing, stuff like that - *this* is in fact the miracle aspect of how things went along, and not just the event itself. And then you can get inside the whole question of G-d creating the world and how and did s/he put inside rules that they can't break themselves or what.

And that's even without getting into the whole aspect of "would you believe in a deity even without the existence of miracles", which is another thing that I find interesting, and which those short few sentences made me think about. And I didn't even mention the while "a good man who suffers through bad things, and a bad man who goes through good things" and -

OK, shutting up now. I shouldn't throw such large paragraphs over a show which is still at such an early stage, right? Um, oops.

I shouldn't throw such large paragraphs over a show which is still at such an early stage, right?

Pfft. Of course you should. It's lovely and proper and you.