( continues...)

Oh, I loved it that Louis used the timers of the sprinklers in order to set all the fires at once - he took the thing that humiliated him, made him worse than a noboy, a weak target of mocking, and used it to be "better than us" as Web (!) says. How appropriate of him. I mean, it obviously has the second layer (or, rather, first, for the characters who couldn't see the scene with the sprinklers and the kids) of the thing that times water being used to time fire, but that makes it even more interesting, to me.

I loved the description in the script of the way the background music mirrors and then negates what's going on in Louis' heart and mind when he meets Rosie and later, her boyfriend. Obviously, I have no idea what song played there, but I could totally hear it in my mind's ears, nonetheless, just by the description of how it accompanies the emotions and responses, both when it fit, as well as when it was the opposite. And usually, music is the last thing I manage to notice (yeah, I'm sorry about it, too - I realize that I miss so much), so the description of it illuminated it for me, possibly, more than actually listening.

And the exact same thing that happened with Rosie, happens now in a much bigger scale with Paul's press conference: Louis thinks he has them at, playing his game, giving him all the attention and power he needs in order to dare to try, despite everything, to communicate with Rosie, and then it's taken away from him, exactly where it was supposed to be the peak of his achievement. Growing circles.

Oh, I loved Danny being the "suspect"! He must have had so much fun this episode, both with the toys as well as with the costume.

Rebecca seems to be taking this way more personally than any other case - saying how things would be her fault, for example, which I can't remember her saying in the past. Again, the most interesting part of the story, at least for me, is not the actual crme plot, but the light it sheds on the characters themselves.

Web talking about how only somebody who knows the power in a match may be able to figure out the arsonist's moves - well, Rebeca did describe him accurately on each and every step of the way, without a single error. And yet, could it be that he wasn't 100% sure, and used that case in order to test his conjecture? Or both? Testing Rebecca's strength, using her (fire being related to her past, traumatic for her either way), while at the same time trying to make sure his theory is correct? Oh, and maybe, just a tiny maybe, because I'm a sap and because Web can't have only possibly two intriguing motives alone, he also gives her - willingly or not - the opportunity to face that past demon and maybe be able to move forward a bit?

Oh, and I love it that Paul, with all his trying-to-do-the-right-thing, being angry at Web and all, got to this information in a really not-so clean way, hiding things, using protected passwords for purposes he wasn't supposed to, and so forth.

I love the Mel-Danny relationship, and I want to hear the delivery of both "I'm offended on your behalf" as well as "I was going for stupid".

Louis talked, a moment before he sat himself on fire, about how there's a chemical that bursts into flames when it comes in contact with water. Mel smelled it. It was all right there in front of everybody, but they didn't see it until it happened. I bet that the place of the next fire is like this, too. Also, I'm quite thankful I didn't get to watch all these flames and screamings and the like - I'm way too much of a wuss for that.

I loved how the name of the episode plays in several meanings all throughout it. It's the physical spot in which a fire starts (that was even mentioned, using the exact phrase, in the episode), but also the beginning. And just like Rebecca said, the first attempt, the point of origin, where it all began, would lead them to the solution. But it works for her, personally, too - in a way, that fire that she might have started was the thing that set her - or, rather, Becky - free, that started her life - and that trauma and guilt - all over again.

(continued...)

( continues...)

And when going to Rosie's place, Web wants Rebecca away from the actual fire, and she is the one who insists on going there with Paul. Things got reversed. And she's the one rushing into the point of origin of the fire, Rosie's apartment. And in doing it, on her choice, she also manages to go through the image of the Pony Man who scared her so much at the beginning of the episode, and even more than that - seeing his image burn, beating that inner demon who still haunts her.

So Web - and at least Paul - know that Rebecca was, in a way, responsible for the deaths of those three people found in that motel. And t least Web seems to offer her comfort regarding that, even beyond her young age and the certainty that she had had no idea what would have happened as a result of the fire that she had started. It's a grey comfort, regarding the possible future victims, perhaps, of her kidnapper (in a way, similar to the Pre-Filer of an earlier episode, who wasn't that different from him killing that serial killer in the very first episode), but still.

And then Rebecca - for the first time, right? - tells his something from her inner world, on her own, by her initiative. Something is different, isn't it? And Web, as manipulative play-at-people as he is, brought that change on.

Oh, and I knew we're going to see the Pony Man again, as soon as Web mentioned that he wasn't at all sure that Becky's kidnapper was one of the bodies. Only, how did Web, again, know? It all comes back to him, even when it's all about Rebecca's past.

OK, back to reality, I guess, for this round, at least. Thanks for the distraction.

Just caught Done The Impossible. Tim is very cute, and makes the best joke in it.

I'm downloading it now!

Also, Kevin, I saw you post something at Whedonesque:

10) The extensive efforts made by the Save Firefly people.

Surprisingly, although this is covered, I thought it gave the impression other people had ran the campaign.

Not having seen the documentary yet, I was just curious about what that meant.

Well, I may have just not been paying attention - that happens a lot - but whenever Firefly: AA came up it was Jeremy talking about what had been done. I just checked and it's termed as "we" did this and that, so I don't think it comes off wrong, it's just kept generic.

I liked DTI more than I thought I would. It's certainly extremely professionally put together.

Gotcha. That makes sense.

And I was very impressed by the professional look of the promo they put together. Glad to hear the documentary lives up to that.

Yep. I think the only errors I could really see was the background noise during Joss' bit (which, of course, isn't something they could get around) and the light reflecting in Tim's glasses (he was facing a window to the outside by the looks of it). And lets face, if that's the biggest problem on a home brew documentary you've done well.

Let's compare this to the one I shot last year. We basically lost the Edinburgh world premiere footage as it was recorded in the wrong DV format, the handheld bits I shot looked appauling, sound was completely wank and there was no time or budget to edit it together. So Jeremy and friends did a little better. I since have thoughts about doing a film on how not to make a documentary, as I think I'd be superb on that subject.

Does anyone know, was Men Without Hats, Safety Dance, any sort of inspiration for the look of Pylea (or even just for Numfar)?

Folks, does anybody know if Nilly's review of Serenity is still kicking about anywhere? Somebody is asking for it: [link]

By the way, Topic!Cindy - best link ever.

shrift posted in the Firefly topic, I believe, that Nilly's site was going to be inaccessible for a bit. shrift's domain was hacked, and she's been killing herself for the past week trying to get everything back up. Maybe someone who's a member of that board could post the information there? I expect it'll be back up soon.