Dear CW,
Responding to those spam e-mails for "Logos for Less"? Not a good idea.
'Bring On The Night'
[NAFDA] "There will be an occasional happy, so that it might be crushed under the boot of the writer." From Zorro to Angel (including Wonderfalls, The Inside and Drive), this is where Buffistas come to anoint themselves in the bloodbath.
Dear CW,
Responding to those spam e-mails for "Logos for Less"? Not a good idea.
That logo makes me expect James Earl Jones to be intoning "This is C U U"
What does that even mean?
It featured a recurring actor named "Christian"?
What does that even mean?
That the writer of that article doesn't get Pax?
They must have missed all the killing and sex...
Or it was TPTB refrence that confused them.
Re: Teen Titans heights
Then Dick and Cyborg.
In one of the current TT trades I have, it lists both Starfire and Cyborg at 6'4", I believe. Of course, Kory's hair makes her seem taller.
Angel was the most Christian show on television?
What does that even mean?
Oh, this made me jones for some of Plei's posts on Angel's (Liam's and maybe even Angelus') Catholicism.
It's actually not a bad assertion in terms of his redemption and overall journey, but pretty useless without a supporting argument. Angel was the recipient of this incredible grace, and his whole journey was based on the struggle between his two natures (which is very old man/new man baptism/rebirth/conversion-theology heavy) and his zealous need to battle the evil he used to spread with gles and with which he is still tempted.
But I think that's what Goldberg means about the Christianity being entirely in subtext. The show employs ideas common to Christian theology, but they are not uniquely Christian. I could say Angel was the most Buddhist show on TV, because it's all about karma and how desire leads to suffering. The show dealt with good and evil a lot, and most religions have a lot to say about those subjects, so it's not hard to find any philosophy you feel like looking for.
I prefer to think that the letter-writer seriously misunderstood the Jasmine arc.
But I think that's what Goldberg means about the Christianity being entirely in subtext.I agree, Strega. I haven't followed the whole conversation--just the NRO page Allyson linked. I didn't think Goldberg was holding the letter writer up for ridicule, so much as saying, "Valid POV, as long as you're talking about subtext." That Goldberg saved the reader's letter for the end of the entry left me uncertain of his point in quoting the reader. Is there more, elsewhere?