Whew.
Danger's my birthright.
Buffy ,'The Killer In Me'
The Minearverse 5: Closer to the Earth, Further from the Ax
[NAFDA] "There will be an occasional happy, so that it might be crushed under the boot of the writer." From Zorro to Angel (including Wonderfalls, The Inside and Drive), this is where Buffistas come to anoint themselves in the bloodbath.
§ ita § - Oct 02, 2006 8:54:08 am PDT #1384 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Polter-Cow - Oct 02, 2006 8:58:25 am PDT #1385 of 10001
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!
Also, I believe Wikipedia over IMDB.
That's sort of depressingly true. I have no idea how Wikipedia manages to remain so..."accurate," given how fucking huge it is and that anyone can edit in whatever the hell they want to at any time. While IMDb theoretically monitors content before they put it on the site.
§ ita § - Oct 02, 2006 9:05:17 am PDT #1386 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I think that Wikipedia is more current. I mean, the IMDB entry was accurate once upon a time. As for general error-checking, I don't use Wikipedia for much that IMDB covers, so I can't compare.
Kevin - Oct 02, 2006 9:27:53 am PDT #1387 of 10001
Never fall in love with somebody you actually love.
Yeah, IMDB relies on people finding and submitting information.
Also, I'm not entirely sure they are actually checking information nowadays. Classic example: the fact 3 different actresses have been listed for Wonder Woman.
§ ita § - Oct 02, 2006 9:29:42 am PDT #1388 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I had to submit an entire TV Movie just to list a credit for a friend, and they required a laborious amount of information. But once the shows/movies are created, there's much less of a barrier for me to assign credits--I wonder what they'd even check that against.
Kevin - Oct 02, 2006 9:44:14 am PDT #1389 of 10001
Never fall in love with somebody you actually love.
Just looking, Wikipedia'ing Joss Whedon shows pretty accurate information. Meanwhile, going to WhedonWiki.com from Whedonesque is full of inaccuracies.
I'm clearly bored.
Matt the Bruins fan - Oct 02, 2006 10:38:44 am PDT #1390 of 10001
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand
Since both tend to be user-driven information sources, I'd tend to put more faith in the site whose users are accustomed to researching in encyclopedias than the one with message boards full of flamewars about whether or not a given celebrity is HAWT.
Polter-Cow - Oct 02, 2006 10:45:34 am PDT #1391 of 10001
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!
"She looks like..."
Kevin - Oct 02, 2006 10:59:15 am PDT #1392 of 10001
Never fall in love with somebody you actually love.
"Wonder Woman!"
Joss' Wikipedia entry has his address on it. Dear god.
Allyson - Oct 02, 2006 11:06:57 am PDT #1393 of 10001
Wait, is this real-world child support, where the money goes to buy food for the kids, or MRA fantasyland child support where the women just buy Ferraris and cocaine? -Jessica
Home or email?