All right, so folks, I need help. I've been pondering this for months now, and I still can't figure out how I'm going to decide between L.A., San Francisco, and Portland. How does one make these decisions? Help!

1) What attracts you to those cities? What do you think you would like/not like about them?

2) What do you know about the job market in all three places? Do you have connections that can help you find jobd in any of the cities?

3) Where do you have the most people you know/like/can help you get started there?

4) San Francisco. Duh.

Hee, Perkins.

Go Bangkok! Choose Bangkok!

t /unfailingly optimistic

Where do you have the most people you know/like/can help you get started there?

Toss-up between LA and SF. But my bestest friend from college lives in Portland, so she counts extra.

What do you know about the job market in all three places? Do you have connections that can help you find jobd in any of the cities?

LA's badly enough in need that they're offering hiring bonuses. SF I'm not sure about, but Oakland seems to have a pretty high demand. Portland's not listing their openings until June, so I'll take a look later this week.

San Francisco. Duh.

This is what my brother said, but he followed it up with "although it's really expensive and hard to park here," so it was sort of a mixed recommendation.

I did something weird when trying to select text, and now it won't let me. So about the first question: uh... Um. Lack of New England winters. General west-coasty-ness. I'm worried LA will be too hot for me, and also LARGE. I worry that both SF and LA are too big-city for me (this despite living on the outskirts of Boston for ten years -- don't expect me to be logical). But maybe I should try a big city, and this time a proper one, where everything doesn't close at 11 PM (this, of course, after I've entered a profession which requires going to bed at 9 PM). Then, of course, there's the problem that all my knowledge about the LA school system comes from movies which uniformly depict it as Gangland Hell with Pimples. Which seems unlikely to be an entirely accurate depiction, but there you have it.

I worry that both SF and LA are too big-city for me (this despite living on the outskirts of Boston for ten years -- don't expect me to be logical).

I've never been to the west coast, but I have this completely unsupported prejudice in my head, that if you like Boston, you will like SF better than you like LA.

The Redondo Beach schools would have you - close to the water and semi-big cityness. It'd be a drive to get up here to visit The Cutest Baby Named Emeline, and the rest of us, but it's a beautiful city.

Emily, I have to say, that San Francisco did not seem like a Big City to me, in the way that New York and London seem to be so (to me). San Fran has that same sort of neighborhood big-city-but-small-town-vibe that Boston has. (in the one week I was there).

that if you like Boston

I'm not sure I do like Boston, though. Cambridge, yes. Boston? Eh. Unless you mean the small-big-cityness of it, in which case, gotcha.

I'm sitting right next to you, so I could just say this...but... Since living with you, you've talked mostly about wanting to live in Portland...the weather, the town, the, well, I don't remember what else. I think you've talked most about Portland, and well maybe Arizona, but that's not even on your list.