$12.89
Reavers ain't men. Or they forgot how to be. Now they're just nothing. They got out to the edge of the galaxy, to that place of nothing, and that's what they became.
Mal ,'Bushwhacked'
Natter .44 Magnum: Do You Feel Chatty, Punk?
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Scrappy - May 01, 2006 9:59:58 am PDT #4758 of 10002
Life moves pretty fast. You don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.
Frankenbuddha - May 01, 2006 10:07:33 am PDT #4759 of 10002
"We are the Goon Squad and we're coming to town...Beep! Beep!" - David Bowie, "Fashion"
£2.50
Dana - May 01, 2006 10:07:37 am PDT #4760 of 10002
I haven't trusted science since I saw the film "Flubber."
Somewhere in the middle.
tommyrot - May 01, 2006 10:09:09 am PDT #4761 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
A 87 lb. ball of twine and 3 cinnamon gumballs.
Dana - May 01, 2006 10:11:35 am PDT #4762 of 10002
I haven't trusted science since I saw the film "Flubber."
And a paper clip!
The actual answer is over $7700. Less than five hours to go on most items. Aaaaaaaa.
Trudy Booth - May 01, 2006 10:45:16 am PDT #4763 of 10002
Greece's financial crisis threatens to take down all of Western civilization - a civilization they themselves founded. A rather tragic irony - which is something they also invented. - Jon Stewart
(I mean, I think 41 and Bar are Episcopalians. Not the hip-hop kind.)
41 and Bar could be the name of a rap group. Totally.
§ ita § - May 01, 2006 10:59:00 am PDT #4764 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
The actual answer is over $7700. Less than five hours to go on most items. Aaaaaaaa.
Excellent!
Burrell, is this weekend too soon?
Dana - May 01, 2006 11:00:13 am PDT #4765 of 10002
I haven't trusted science since I saw the film "Flubber."
Almost $7900 now. aaaaaaaaa.
bon bon - May 01, 2006 11:10:43 am PDT #4766 of 10002
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
What is the proper grammar with "none" as the subject? "None involve" or "none involves"?
§ ita § - May 01, 2006 11:12:54 am PDT #4767 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I think it's "none involve" based on my cursory testing of "none of these involve carnage."
Which brings me to my next question. I just read a snippet of "Deadshot: Urban Renewal" which had a character Zoe Torres. And reflexively I assumed Firefly tip of the hat.