I'm fairly certain I said no interruptions.

Buffy ,'Potential'


Natter .44 Magnum: Do You Feel Chatty, Punk?  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Kathy A - Apr 24, 2006 10:49:40 am PDT #3258 of 10002
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil

Interesting...:

The Illinois General Assembly is about to rock the nation. Members of state legislatures are normally not considered as having the ability to decide issues with a massive impact to the nation as a whole. Representative Karen A. Yarbrough of Illinois' 7th District is about to shatter that perception forever. Representative Yarbrough stumbled on a little known and never utilized rule of the US House of Representatives, Section 603 of Jefferson's Manual of the Rules of the United States House of Representatives, which allows federal impeachment proceedings to be initiated by joint resolution of a state legislature. From there, Illinois House Joint Resolution 125 (hereafter to be referred to as HJR0125) was born.

Detailing five specific charges against President Bush including one that is specified to be a felony, the complete text of HJR0125 is copied below at the end of this article. One of the interesting points is that one of the items, the one specified as a felony, that the NSA was directed by the President to spy on American citizens without warrant, is not in dispute. That fact should prove an interesting dilemma for a Republican controlled US House that clearly is not only loathe to initiate impeachment proceedings, but does not even want to thoroughly investigate any of the five items brought up by the Illinois Assembly as high crimes and/or misdemeanors. Should HJR0125 be passed by the Illinois General Assembly, the US House will be forced by House Rules to take up the issue of impeachment as a privileged bill, meaning it will take precedence over other House business.


tommyrot - Apr 24, 2006 10:51:01 am PDT #3259 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Huh.

Go FIBs!


Jessica - Apr 24, 2006 10:51:45 am PDT #3260 of 10002
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

LASIK@Home. (Yes, it's a joke.)


juliana - Apr 24, 2006 10:53:23 am PDT #3261 of 10002
I’d be lying if I didn’t say that I miss them all tonight…

Wow. Awesome.


tommyrot - Apr 24, 2006 10:55:30 am PDT #3262 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

LASIK@Home.

I'm waiting for the Travel LASIK kit.


Jessica - Apr 24, 2006 10:57:00 am PDT #3263 of 10002
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

I'm waiting for the Travel LASIK kit.

So you can perform LASIK on a plane?


tommyrot - Apr 24, 2006 10:59:05 am PDT #3264 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

So you can perform LASIK on a plane?

I was thinking more at a hotel on the night before going to a client's office.

In case, you know, I don't have time until then.


Steph L. - Apr 24, 2006 11:01:43 am PDT #3265 of 10002
I look more rad than Lutheranism

So you can perform LASIK on a plane?

That's LASIK on a *motherfucking* plane, missy.


sumi - Apr 24, 2006 11:02:53 am PDT #3266 of 10002
Art Crawl!!!

Here is the article with the full resolution.


tommyrot - Apr 24, 2006 11:06:18 am PDT #3267 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

That's LASIK on a *motherfucking* plane, missy.

Yeah. Because if there's one thing worse than motherfucking snakes on a motherfucking plane, it's motherfucking nearsighted snakes on a motherfucking plane.