Well, leaving Plame's identity leak aside, since that seems separate, the other information that Bush is supposed to have authorized to leak must have been classified, otherwise, why make the point that the president can declassify?
Natter 43: I Love My Dead Gay Whale Crosspost.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
The president may or may not have the power to declassify information. It is, however, a long and involved process, and consists of more than him saying "hmm, I don't want this to be classified anymore. Hey Scooter, c'mere!"
I'm suspicious when these things come up and TDS & Colbert have gone on a week's hiatus! It's like the Authorities planned them to come out at that time, or something.
Calli, what I'm gonna do is go downstairs, smoke a cigarette, listen to The Clash, and think about what I'm gonna order for dinner.
The president may or may not have the power to declassify information. It is, however, a long and involved process, and consists of more than him saying "hmm, I don't want this to be classified anymore. Hey Scooter, c'mere!"
Vortex, may I tag you?
I just got out of a training that left me close to tears in absolute frustration that I couldn't express due to a dismissive jackhole.
New software system to automate travel. Adds more work to me and to scientists. Makes it easier on travel. Software does not actually work the way we actually work, and doesn't allow for unusual circumstances. Adds additional new paperwork for me in some cases, and much more follow-up time.
Now, software developers, please, please make me feel better.
Wouldn't one buy/modify the software to bend to the way the user conducts business, and NOT make the user bend to software's fucked up idea of how other people do business?
Of course, it's an off-the-shelf package that can't be modified to fit us, because then they wouldn't be able to update it.
Software peeps. Please, tell me I'm not insane.
Wouldn't one buy/modify the software to bend to the way the user conducts business, and NOT make the user bend to software's fucked up idea of how other people do business?
Of course, it's an off-the-shelf package that can't be modified to fit us, because then they wouldn't be able to update it.
Sadly, we have the same issues with all of our proprietary software too. (Everything, and I mean EVERYTHING we use was written to serve one particular department's needs. The rest of us are expected to work around that.)
Vortex, may I tag you?
but of course!
Wouldn't one buy/modify the software to bend to the way the user conducts business, and NOT make the user bend to software's fucked up idea of how other people do business?
Usually it's because management is all, "This is the new software we've decided to use andIdon'twannahearanycomplaitslalalalaIcan'thearyou...."
Wouldn't one buy/modify the software to bend to the way the user conducts business, and NOT make the user bend to software's fucked up idea of how other people do business?
In theory, one would. In theory. We have software & websites built for us that don't work the way we work because management and IT often fail to ask the end users what they need. I'm sorry, Allyson. That always sucks.