To commemorate a past event, you kill and eat an animal. It's a ritual sacrifice, with pie.

Anya ,'Sleeper'


Natter 43: I Love My Dead Gay Whale Crosspost.  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Calli - Mar 30, 2006 10:17:45 am PST #7289 of 10001
I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul—Calvin and Hobbs

They come from somewhere and, likely as not, your parents and their moral/religious beliefs.

By that logic, my Gaia worship is a direct result of my parents' firm Methodist beliefs and my upbringing therein. A conclusion that would probably surprise them (and John Wesley, for that matter).


Sophia Brooks - Mar 30, 2006 10:20:36 am PST #7290 of 10001
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here

And I realize no one cares about this conversation any longer, which is the nature of Natter, but there we go.

I actually am fascinated by this conversation, because (and I hope this doesn't sound rude) it lets me peek inside the brain of someone I know to be Christian and a good, rational, person. Sometimes, because the pattern of thought where the deepest part of belief comes from another power is so alien to me, I feel like all religious people are really bluffing and don't really believe. But I see that not only is that belief true i, but it is so deeply a part of a true believe that it is inconcieveable that someone would think like me-- sort of the opposite of how I think.

Did this make any sense?

Although I believe in some sort of supernatural power, the sureness of my morals is more the foundation of that belief (off to the side, so to speak) than the result of it.

For example, I would say that my moral code, boiled down, would be:

Don't hurt people.

(sub-code Work hard. Help others. Stay out of other people's business)

So, when I make a judgement, on something- that is my question-- does it hurt someone? Of course it is not always that clear-- sometimes I have to weigh one hurt against another-- but take the death penalty-- I am against it. It kills someone. I am against the killer, but becoming killers ourselves is not the way to go.

Anyway, my point is-- nowhere in my little thought process did I consider God or any supernatural belief, nor, really, do I feel my lack of practical religious bent make any differance in my judgement.

Thank you, Cindy for bringing this back, and please let me know if I am misrepresenting what I think you said.


Topic!Cindy - Mar 30, 2006 10:31:56 am PST #7291 of 10001
What is even happening?

Although I believe in some sort of supernatural power, the sureness of my morals is more the foundation of that belief (off to the side, so to speak) than the result of it.

I don't disagree with this, Sophia. That's what I was trying to say when I said I was glad ita pointed out what billytea said. I can hardly see anyone believing in a religion that used a moral framework that was in total opposition to his own (lying is good; murder is good; kindness is bad).

Anyway, my point is-- nowhere in my little thought process did I consider God or any supernatural belief, nor, really, do I feel my lack of practical religious bent make any differance in my judgement.
I don't think lack of practical religious bent makes a different in someone's moral judgment, either. I hope that was clear. I know far too many moral people of either no religion, other religions, or who only have less-defined beliefs about that kind of stuff, to think otherwise. In other words, when a religious person says "You can't be a moral person if you are not religious," I know that's incorrect.

Thank you, Cindy for bringing this back, and please let me know if I am misrepresenting what I think you said.
Thank you, Sophia. I don't think you misrepresented it. I guess my definition of world view just includes all of it. World view is probably my '42'. When I use the term, I mean how you look at everything from morals, to your place in the universe, your place in relation to all the other creatures we know about (all other humans, animals, and the environment) and for those who believe in some sort of supernatural, that goes in there, too.


Jesse - Mar 30, 2006 10:33:04 am PST #7292 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

In other words, when a religious person says "You can be a moral person if you are not religious," I know that's incorrect.

You left out a "not" there, right?


Allyson - Mar 30, 2006 10:36:26 am PST #7293 of 10001
Wait, is this real-world child support, where the money goes to buy food for the kids, or MRA fantasyland child support where the women just buy Ferraris and cocaine? -Jessica

"You can be a moral person if you are not religious," I know that's incorrect.

head explodes


Topic!Cindy - Mar 30, 2006 10:45:03 am PST #7294 of 10001
What is even happening?

I left out a huge NOT there. What I meant to write was, "When a religious person says, 'You CAN'T be a moral person if you are not religious', I know that's incorrect."

Sheeeeesh. Holy wars have started over less. Thank developers for the edit function.


Topic!Cindy - Mar 30, 2006 10:45:27 am PST #7295 of 10001
What is even happening?

*pastes Allyson's hed back on*


Cashmere - Mar 30, 2006 10:47:37 am PST #7296 of 10001
Now tagless for your comfort.

I assumed that was a mistake immdiately.


brenda m - Mar 30, 2006 10:48:46 am PST #7297 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

Heh, that had me cracking up as soon as I spotted it. Because don't typos like that only ever happen right where they can do the most damage?


Topic!Cindy - Mar 30, 2006 10:48:55 am PST #7298 of 10001
What is even happening?

Bless you, or ~ma you, or smooch you. Whatever works in your world view, baby.