As a woman who has given birth, I can honestly say that that's one view of me that I would not allow to be captured by camera, much less commemorated in bronze.
Natter 43: I Love My Dead Gay Whale Crosspost.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Mojitos are a very good thing. So are three-and-a-half-hour dinners. And free key lime cheesecake for your b-day.
ChiKat is even a better one (person, not thing, although she could be rated a Sexay Thang). She got me my very first tiara!
From above linky.
The legal requirements are different for proving public intoxication than for proving a person is driving under the influence, she said. The standard is not whether a person has a blood alcohol content of 0.08 percent; it's whether the person poses a threat to themselves or others.
I can't believe they don't even have to do a test. The other think I'm wondering is if they can do this to a private club. If not, it's pretty much in effect saying only the richer people have a right to get their party on.
Didn't we try this before and it didn't work out so well?
Dude, seriously?
Seriously!
Mini apple pies might help to ease the pain.
If I were nice, I'd get right on this. Shame.
As a woman who has given birth, I can honestly say that that's one view of me that I would not allow to be captured by camera, much less commemorated in bronze.
I haven't given birth, and no one gets to cast my va-jay-jay in bronze.
Hey, if we say va-jay-jay bojangeler a whole lot, do you think Rio might suddenly appear?
Do we need to say it 3 times while turning around in front of our computers in the dark?
The legal requirements are different for proving public intoxication than for proving a person is driving under the influence, she said. The standard is not whether a person has a blood alcohol content of 0.08 percent; it's whether the person poses a threat to themselves or others.
The State of Victoria is the only place in Australia that retains the criminal charge of public drunkenness. A review has just suggested that this be decriminalised, though it also recommends that this be accompanied by increasing the availability of drying-out facilities in the city.
Well, the article is about the cops going into a bar and arresting people for being drunk based solely on their observations. To make it doubly stupid, the guy interviewed who was arrested was at a hotel bar.
Well, the article is about the cops going into a bar and arresting people for being drunk based solely on their observations. To make it doubly stupid, the guy interviewed who was arrested was at a hotel bar.
t starts singing Gay Bar
t wonders why the office went so quiet all of a sudden
Commission officials are defending the actions, noting that being drunk in public is against the law and that any place licensed to serve booze is, by law, a public place....
"They feel like its violating their rights. How can you give somebody a public intox? That's what you go to a bar for," said Todd Williams, 27, a supervisor at Boston's Restaurant and Sports Bar
Reminds me of Ron White's routine: "I wasn't drunk in public. I was drunk in a bar. They threw me into public! Arrest them!"