ChiKat, I'm making a pit stop, and then I'm on the road. I'll see you in an hour!!
'Dirty Girls'
Natter 43: I Love My Dead Gay Whale Crosspost.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Woo hoo! Mojitos!!
Move over Bird Flu, a new version of the old, reliable tuberculosis may wind up being the next global pandemic.
the old, reliable tuberculosis
There's a reason it's a classic...
being home and in pjs and off of feet is good. sleep will be better, but must unwind.
Christianity--or any other religion--doesn't make you moral or ethical. Morals and ethics make you the type of Christian--or other faith--you are.
Beverly, do you mind if I tag this?
I got down to the printer and discovered that it wouldn't power up. I traced the plug back to a power strip. I traced the power strip to an extension cord. I traced the extension cord back to the same power strip.
I'm proud to say that while I have made many stoopid tech support calls, I actually fixed this for a public workstation when the tech support didn't notice it. t /preening
Also good and happy?
MONKEY NOODLE
Monkey Noodle really is good and happy.
Monkey Noodle really is good and happy.
Not as happy as KPRINKLE.
Christianity--or any other religion--doesn't make you moral or ethical. Morals and ethics make you the type of Christian--or other faith--you are.
When I stopped being a Christian, the thinking that took me there revolved around the statement "God is good." Interestingly, this was a key consideration in Bertrand Russell's Why I Am Not A Christian too. Anyway, the question is, what do we understand by this? Is it that we come to an understanding of God otherwise, and we understand good to be His will? Or is it that we understand the distinction between good and evil, and God too is subject to the demands of morality? Russell, as I recall, was more interested in the first conclusion, which leaves God without any guidance or standard for action; any arbitrary action of His becomes by definition good. I was interested in the latter, that if morality existed independent of God - things that are good given the existence of God must still be good without Him - then is there not something higher than God? And what use, then, is God? I basically ontological proof'd myself out of believing in God.
Nowadays, I would have a different answer to the question, namely that for the believer (one who lives by Micah 6:8, anyway), the two concepts are not sufficiently separable to make one subject to the other. The understanding of each influences the understanding of the other. And I really like people of faith like that. But interestingly, it doesn't take me back over the bridge.