Heh, don't you think I should have the right to defend my home and family from attackers? Shouldn't I be able to use whatever weaponry I need to protect the lives of my loved ones, including heavy machine-guns, flamethrowers and nuclear weapons?
How's it sit? Pretty cunning, don'tchya think?
Jayne ,'The Message'
Natter 43: I Love My Dead Gay Whale Crosspost.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
tommyrot - Mar 10, 2006 6:55:13 am PST #3209 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
Allyson - Mar 10, 2006 6:56:19 am PST #3210 of 10001
Wait, is this real-world child support, where the money goes to buy food for the kids, or MRA fantasyland child support where the women just buy Ferraris and cocaine? -Jessica
Heh, don't you think I should have the right to defend my home and family from attackers?
We've solved this by owning rottweillers.
tommyrot - Mar 10, 2006 6:57:26 am PST #3211 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
We've solved this by owning rottweillers.
Then what will I use to defend myself against the rottweillers?
::orders rail gun from Acme::
TomW - Mar 10, 2006 6:58:19 am PST #3212 of 10001
"The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be."
We've solved this by owning rottweillers.
Shouldn't the rottweillers be nuclear capable? You know, just in case.
tommyrot - Mar 10, 2006 7:01:01 am PST #3213 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
Shouldn't the rottweillers be nuclear capable? You know, just in case.
To defend themselves against the sharks with friggin' laser beams on their heads?
Have we all heard about the government research into controlling sharks, turning them into weapons? This is cool, as it resulted in the coolest blog title ever: Shark and Awe.
Kathy A - Mar 10, 2006 7:01:16 am PST #3214 of 10001
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil
A moat, sharks, deathbeam lasers on sharks' backs...Bond villains have the right idea.
Hee!! Laser-mounted shark crosspost! I love my Buffistas.
Ginger - Mar 10, 2006 7:02:29 am PST #3215 of 10001
"It didn't taste good. It tasted soooo horrible. It tasted like....a vodka martini." - Matilda
If we could fund education adequately in the name of national security that would be keen
This actually happened for science and math education after Sputnik. Maybe we could get the money to improve science and math education today if the Chinese invented a giant killer robot.
sarameg - Mar 10, 2006 7:03:24 am PST #3216 of 10001
Shouldn't the rottweillers be nuclear capable?
Just feed them a lot of cheese and ice cream. Never failed to give the dogs I've known the most toxic explosive farts ever.
Steph L. - Mar 10, 2006 7:04:01 am PST #3217 of 10001
I look more rad than Lutheranism
Shouldn't the rottweillers be nuclear capable? You know, just in case.
To defend themselves against the sharks with friggin' laser beams on their heads?
Or the dogs with bees in their mouths, and when they bark they shoot bees at you!
§ ita § - Mar 10, 2006 7:05:11 am PST #3218 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
if the Chinese invented a giant killer robot.
Come brothers! The Chinese have built a robot!