::standing in JZ's corner::
'Destiny'
Natter 43: I Love My Dead Gay Whale Crosspost.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I have no recollection of pockets in formal gowns during the 80s. Puffy sleeves, yes. Big bows, yes. Pockets, no.
Could you tell either of those dresses had pockets by the silhouettes?
I haven't seen enough pictures sans hands-in-pockets to tell.
I wish to announce that the word "pocket" has now lost all meaning for me. Pocket pocket pocket pocket POCKET.
I have no recollection of pockets in formal gowns during the 80s. Puffy sleeves, yes. Big bows, yes. Pockets, no.
It's not that they remind me of the 80s, it's just where my brain wants to put them.
I think pockets in formalwear have the potential to look far more elegant and streamlined than carrying a purse.
Hands in pockets isn't the only way to look jaunty or insouciant in formalwear; it is, however, my favorite way.
Also, I despise being out at a big event and have to find a place to stash one's purse or hide it or find someone to babysit it before getting up to dance. Formally dressed with everything on my person and both hands free at all times=bliss.
I think pockets in formalwear have the potential to look far more elegant and streamlined than carrying a purse.
I opine in the opposite direction, because I think it's easier to find a lovely purse than a good place to put pockets in a lovely dress. And I'm driven by the dress above all--you can after all leave the less-than-optimal purse somewhere, but the less-than-optimal-pocket-accomodating line of the dress goes with you everywhere.
I have no real opinion on pockets in formal wear.
I am however wearing a dress today, which seems to be confusing a lot of people.
I am however wearing a dress today, which seems to be confusing a lot of people.
The one dress I wear to work is maroon velvet with no place for pockets. The insouciance must come from the footwear. Or the fact that I'm almost head-to-toe in velvet, I suppose.
I rather like the pockets, and I imagine it would be nice to have a place to tuck some necessities without having to carry a purse. I think they just have to be careful with the placement and how they end up sticking their hands in them.
I also remember reading - years and years ago - something by, I believe, Samuel R. Delaney in which a woman complained that in having her rank (royal to commoner?) reduced meant she could no longer have pockets in her clothes.