Who got dumped the first week of TAR? I missed the end.
Well, my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle.
Mal ,'Our Mrs. Reynolds'
Natter 43: I Love My Dead Gay Whale Crosspost.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
SuziQ - Mar 06, 2006 12:27:34 pm PST #2146 of 10001
Back tattoos of the mother is that you are absolutely right - Ame
sumi - Mar 06, 2006 12:28:16 pm PST #2147 of 10001
Art Crawl!!!
The first dumpees were the gay friends from Boston.
Jesse - Mar 06, 2006 12:30:09 pm PST #2148 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Aurelia, I think if I thought the Oscars were merit-based I'd pay more attention to the winners and not to the spectacle.
In light of that, I have a longer-term prediction: The next time Paul Giamatti has a decent role in a movie that's at least reasonably well-received and not a complete flop, financially, he'll win best supporting actor.
JohnSweden - Mar 06, 2006 12:33:16 pm PST #2149 of 10001
I can't even.
I never liked Rachel before The Constant Gardener. She was merely tolerable in the Mummy movies. I think she rocks now.
I thought she was really good in Enemy at the Gates. That movie sold me on her. The Mummy(ies) ... blah.
§ ita § - Mar 06, 2006 12:34:07 pm PST #2150 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
The next time Paul Giamatti has a decent role in a movie that's at least reasonably well-received and not a complete flop, financially, he'll win best supporting actor.
Do you think it has to be reasonably soon? Have his not-wins been high-profile enough to span more than, say, three years?
Also, when will Don Cheadle get his we-do-like-you Oscar, dammit?
I thought she was really good in Enemy at the Gates.
Never saw that. No idea why no...wait, right, war movie.
msbelle - Mar 06, 2006 12:36:26 pm PST #2151 of 10001
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
Don should have been up for Crash, IMO.
aurelia - Mar 06, 2006 12:39:46 pm PST #2152 of 10001
All sorrows can be borne if you put them into a story. Tell me a story.
Aurelia, I think if I thought the Oscars were merit-based I'd pay more attention to the winners and not to the spectacle.
I realize awards are never so pure (even on much smaller scale than the Oscars).
For me it's an opportunity to ooh and ahh at fashion (a beloved pasttime of mine) and to hope against hope that my mind-control rays are finally totally debugged.
That's cool. That seems to be the case for the majority. I'm just less cranky when I skip that part.
JohnSweden - Mar 06, 2006 12:43:01 pm PST #2153 of 10001
I can't even.
Never saw that. No idea why no...wait, right, war movie.
Didn't know you had a thing about war movies, fair enough. The story is really boiled down to a very small scale, but there are plenty of war movie elements. Rachel Weisz pretty much steals the show from Joseph Fiennes and Ed Harris whenever she is on screen.
Jesse - Mar 06, 2006 12:43:34 pm PST #2154 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Do you think it has to be reasonably soon? Have his not-wins been high-profile enough to span more than, say, three years?
Hmm. I dunno. Three feels like the limit.
Also, when will Don Cheadle get his we-do-like-you Oscar, dammit?
They gave out all the black-people Oscars already, sorry.
msbelle - Mar 06, 2006 12:44:49 pm PST #2155 of 10001
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
JESSE! Hollywood was a pioneer in the civil right movement. How dare you suggest they have a color bias?