TAR: In theory, the older couple should be competitive, they do lots of sports & et cetera -- the woman has climbed all 54 of Colorado's 14K high peaks, for instance. They showed really badly in this first leg, and I don't expect them to last.
I'm not on the ship. I'm in the ship. I am the ship.
River ,'Objects In Space'
Natter 43: I Love My Dead Gay Whale Crosspost.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Theodosia - Mar 06, 2006 12:21:00 pm PST #2143 of 10001
'we all walk this earth feeling we are frauds. The trick is to be grateful and hope the caper doesn't end any time soon"
aurelia - Mar 06, 2006 12:23:06 pm PST #2144 of 10001
All sorrows can be borne if you put them into a story. Tell me a story.
Jennifer Garner tripping.
Her "Thank you. I do my own stunts." was very cute, too.
§ ita § - Mar 06, 2006 12:26:08 pm PST #2145 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
This is cute: Backstage at the Oscars.
That's so cute I barely believe it.
Aurelia, I think if I thought the Oscars were merit-based I'd pay more attention to the winners and not to the spectacle. For me it's an opportunity to ooh and ahh at fashion (a beloved pasttime of mine) and to hope against hope that my mind-control rays are finally totally debugged.
SuziQ - Mar 06, 2006 12:27:34 pm PST #2146 of 10001
Back tattoos of the mother is that you are absolutely right - Ame
Who got dumped the first week of TAR? I missed the end.
sumi - Mar 06, 2006 12:28:16 pm PST #2147 of 10001
Art Crawl!!!
The first dumpees were the gay friends from Boston.
Jesse - Mar 06, 2006 12:30:09 pm PST #2148 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Aurelia, I think if I thought the Oscars were merit-based I'd pay more attention to the winners and not to the spectacle.
In light of that, I have a longer-term prediction: The next time Paul Giamatti has a decent role in a movie that's at least reasonably well-received and not a complete flop, financially, he'll win best supporting actor.
JohnSweden - Mar 06, 2006 12:33:16 pm PST #2149 of 10001
I can't even.
I never liked Rachel before The Constant Gardener. She was merely tolerable in the Mummy movies. I think she rocks now.
I thought she was really good in Enemy at the Gates. That movie sold me on her. The Mummy(ies) ... blah.
§ ita § - Mar 06, 2006 12:34:07 pm PST #2150 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
The next time Paul Giamatti has a decent role in a movie that's at least reasonably well-received and not a complete flop, financially, he'll win best supporting actor.
Do you think it has to be reasonably soon? Have his not-wins been high-profile enough to span more than, say, three years?
Also, when will Don Cheadle get his we-do-like-you Oscar, dammit?
I thought she was really good in Enemy at the Gates.
Never saw that. No idea why no...wait, right, war movie.
msbelle - Mar 06, 2006 12:36:26 pm PST #2151 of 10001
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
Don should have been up for Crash, IMO.
aurelia - Mar 06, 2006 12:39:46 pm PST #2152 of 10001
All sorrows can be borne if you put them into a story. Tell me a story.
Aurelia, I think if I thought the Oscars were merit-based I'd pay more attention to the winners and not to the spectacle.
I realize awards are never so pure (even on much smaller scale than the Oscars).
For me it's an opportunity to ooh and ahh at fashion (a beloved pasttime of mine) and to hope against hope that my mind-control rays are finally totally debugged.
That's cool. That seems to be the case for the majority. I'm just less cranky when I skip that part.