If Jennifer Aniston had had anything vaguely interesting to say I might have not been rolling my eyes and therefore caught hers. I think she gave one of the emptiest interviews of the red carpet shenanigans, and the interviewers were doing their solemn best to lower that bar. I dislike her more and more.
Jayne: Captain, can you stop her from bein' cheerful, please? Mal: I don't believe there is a power in the 'verse that can stop Kaylee from being cheerful. Sometimes you just wanna duct tape her mouth and dump her in the hold for a month.
'Serenity'
Natter 43: I Love My Dead Gay Whale Crosspost.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
§ ita § - Mar 06, 2006 5:29:41 am PST #2020 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Jesse - Mar 06, 2006 5:31:41 am PST #2021 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
I wasn't sure if she was rolling her eyes at the interviewer's bad questions or her bad answers, but either way it helped.
Sophia Brooks - Mar 06, 2006 5:34:50 am PST #2022 of 10001
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here
You know what is really weird... every single link upthread during the watch and post links to a picture of "Producer Paul Haggis".
Jesse - Mar 06, 2006 5:36:22 am PST #2023 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
When I clicked on them last night, they were all Ludacris.
§ ita § - Mar 06, 2006 5:39:13 am PST #2024 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
That's weird. When I went back this morning, many of them were...someone else. I don't know why they must shift so.
It wouldn't make sense for all of them to shift, since they're from different sites (though mostly yahoo).
Sophia Brooks - Mar 06, 2006 5:42:07 am PST #2025 of 10001
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here
After watching the oscars, I have a question about boobs.
Is it fashionable for boobs to be far apart or something. I mean, Dolly Parton's boobs are cartainly large enough to smoosh together, and not be these weird, separate things that look fake to me. The only persons boobs who looked normal to me were Paul Giamatti's wifes' (well, and Jennifer garners and Rachel Weisz, but they are pregnant/breastfeeding)
§ ita § - Mar 06, 2006 5:44:46 am PST #2026 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
For Salma's breasts to be far apart, one would have to be on her back.
Jesse - Mar 06, 2006 5:44:59 am PST #2027 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
I confess that I stopped clicking through after the first couple of Yahoo Luda ones.
§ ita § - Mar 06, 2006 5:48:47 am PST #2028 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
The Yahoo URLS are now converting themselves on the fly to the start of their slideshow.
Next time I'll direct link to the images, I guess, which is less profitable for them.
Sophia Brooks - Mar 06, 2006 5:50:12 am PST #2029 of 10001
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here
For Salma's breasts to be far apart, one would have to be on her back.
Well, yes. Although I think her dress made her normally really great breasts look lopsided. But shouldn't Dolly have the same issue as Selma.
And I did stop clicking after, like five "producer Paul Haggis"'s