The whole point of Lugosi's breakthrough performance as Dracula was that it was sexualized. That's where it changes from the previous Nosferatu presentation.
'Lessons'
Literary Buffistas 3: Don't Parse the Blurb, Dear.
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
However, Rice could say she popularized it.
Sure, we still have a lot freedom of speech in this country. But I don't think she can say it truthfully. Did more people read the book or watch the movie "Interview with the Vampire" than watched The Adams family? I wonder how Rice's popularity compares to Dark Shadows at its peak. I wonder how the total viewership (including Video rentals) for old Hammer films compared to that for Rice's (including rentals of course.) Heck, while Vampirilla probably never quite reached Lestat levels of popularity, I wonder how close she came.
I wonder how Rice's popularity compares to Dark Shadows at its peak.
Rice is much more popular. A much bigger phenomenon.
And The Adams Family?
John and Abigail weren't vampires, to my knowledge.
Oh, shit, someone's going to write that book now.
But the Addams Family was comedic. It was a broad parody, to me.
With Dark Shadows, I certainly recall the idea of Barnabas being seductive, but it was still seemed to hew closely to the dark image of the vampire. I think "glamour" is actually a good word for Rice's vampires. Lestat was a very lush, colorful vampire to me.
But-- like I said, very limited in my vampire genre reading.
Oh, shit, someone's going to write that book now.
::making notes...::
In trying to be fair, much as it pains me, I wonder if Laurell wasn't referring to the vampire romance subgenre-- which, even there, she DID NOT PIONEER IT, but still, I wonder if that's what she was referring to.
I agree with Barb here (including the 'much as it pains me' part). I don't think it's the 'vampire genre' Hamilton is claiming so much as the wisecracking, butt-kicking spunky female protaganist battling the supernatural. Of course, in this case, Buffy (the movie) was first, but only by a year, and we all know how long a book is 'in production' before its publication date. I remember discovering Anita Blake with the sixth book. I burned right through it, bought the previous five and devoured those too, then raced to the bookstore to find similar books--and there weren't any (or any that I could find, at least). Now they're a dime a dozen, but back then, not so much. I think that's the genre Hamilton is claiming, not vampires in general.
Evidently Jes Battis wrote a book on chosen families in Buffy and Angel.
Yes, and some sort of Farscape thing too...
Lori Herter wrote a trilogy of vampire romances back in the early '90s, predating Hamilton by a few years, I believe.