River: They weren't cows inside. They were waiting to be, but they forgot. Now they see the sky and they remember what they are. Mal: Is it bad that what she said made perfect sense to me?

'Safe'


Literary Buffistas 3: Don't Parse the Blurb, Dear.

There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."


erikaj - Jun 19, 2006 6:30:09 am PDT #681 of 28061
I'm a fucking amazing catch!--Fiona Gallagher, Shameless(US)

wow...there's one I don't know. I'm surprised. Oh, and somebody tell me the world doesn't need a Tommy and Tuppence crossover Wooster story because suddenly I have an urge.


sumi - Jun 19, 2006 6:38:35 am PDT #682 of 28061
Art Crawl!!!

No, the world ABSOLUTELY needs a Tommy and Tuppence/Wooster X-Over.


Sophia Brooks - Jun 19, 2006 6:40:19 am PDT #683 of 28061
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here

I think the world, generally, just needs more Tommy and Tuppence. I actually love then more than I love Nick and Nora, actually.


Jesse - Jun 19, 2006 6:41:21 am PDT #684 of 28061
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

I think the world, generally, just needs more Tommy and Tuppence. I actually love then more than I love Nick and Nora, actually.

Me too! It probably helps being exposed to them at a young age.


Kathy A - Jun 19, 2006 7:32:25 am PDT #685 of 28061
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil

Not Matt, but:

And I know they're, jeez, 70 years old, so I do understand that, and viewed in that light they're amazingly modern.

I'm a big fan of CL Moore, too (read "Shambleau" and the first two Jirel stories for the SF Feminist lit class I took in college), and this is what really struck me about them. "Shambleau," especially, is amazingly modern, considering it was written in, what, 1936? I really think Moore was at least 10-15 years ahead of her time in her style.

I like to think that the female writer in the ST:DS9 ep "Beyond the Stars" was based on her, or at least women like her--ones who had to hide their gender behind pseudonyms and androgynous pennames, but who had talent to spare. (James Tiptree, Jr., aka Alice Sheldon, was remarkably talented, even though most of her stories/books end up being strident feminist tracts--"Houston, We Have a Problem" was the one I read for that class, and most of us students had serious issues with her anti-male attitude.)


Fred Pete - Jun 19, 2006 7:42:57 am PDT #686 of 28061
Ann, that's a ferret.

I really think Moore was at least 10-15 years ahead of her time in her style.

At least. And in the '40s, she and Henry Kuttner (her husband) had what may have been the truest partnership in all of literature.


Kathy A - Jun 19, 2006 8:27:25 am PDT #687 of 28061
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil

I was really lucky about ten years ago when I was in the midst of a "hit every Friends of the Local Library Book Sale" phase (six weekends in a row roaming Lake County, looking for collectible books really cheap). I didn't get to the Lake Zurich library until around 3:00 on Saturday afternoon, and sure enough, the selection was definitely picked over by then. But, while scanning the general fiction table, I quite literally squealed in excitement when I saw the long-out-of-print Best of CL Moore collection I'd been searching for since that college lit class. One dollar later, I was a very happy bookaholic!


Hayden - Jun 19, 2006 5:46:39 pm PDT #688 of 28061
aka "The artist formerly known as Corwood Industries."

Cindy, I would love to hear your reaction to Marilynne Robinson's essay on liberal Christianity in this month's Harper's.


Topic!Cindy - Jun 20, 2006 3:33:26 am PDT #689 of 28061
What is even happening?

Is it online, Corwood? I went to harpers.org and didn't find it, but I've only had a cup of coffee. Google is being similarly stingey with the love.


Hayden - Jun 20, 2006 6:09:54 am PDT #690 of 28061
aka "The artist formerly known as Corwood Industries."

It doesn't look like it's online yet. Harpers.org still has last month's cover up on the current issue page (way to keep current, guys!), and I can't seem to find it elsewhere, either. Definitely worth a read, although this issue isn't one of the standouts elsewhere.