Yeah I actually think Rowling is wrong on this - just not for any of the reasons OSC said. Stop being on my side Fucko!
Snerk. Very much this. I can just live with sincere people of good will who disagree with me, but what's with obnoxious little shits who are on my side?! (Speaking generally here--I haven't studied the Rowling issue enough to have a strong opinion.)
My feeling about OSC is that he makes some good points, however,he is so arragont and self centered that he has no judgment.
This, too. He never seems to stop at, "Here's my opinion, and here's some evidence to back it up." It's more, "Here's my opinion, and anyone who disagrees is idiotic and/or immoral." (With or without evidence to back himself up.)
Writers Who Aren't Full of Shit:
If Ray Bradbury doesn't qualify to be on that list, I don't want to know. I wish to live in ignorant bliss.
OSC is a hot fluttering mess of logical fallacies.
Emma Bull, not full of shit. Jane Espenson, also.
Does it count if the writer is full of the same shit as you?
Cause I totally related to David Simon gift-wrapping his shitlist and taking it on the road.
But it might be some kind of *bull* shit
Emma Bull, not full of shit. Jane Espenson, also.
Plus they have excellent taste in friends.
S. Brust - not full of shit. But your FOS may vary.
Ray Bradbury - wrong on a lot of stuff, but don't think he is full of shit.
Gaiman has written about the lexicon thing, too: [link]
That made me miss Tim Hunter.
Neil Gaiman? Not an ass, and one can read his non-fiction with relaxation and ease.