You really have to pick and choose OSC's writing.

Oddly, slashdot thought his essay about JKR's lawsuit was large with the funny.

Basically, OSC thinks that Rowling's bully and a hypocrite who should admit that Ender's Game: Harry Potter as Harry Potter: Lexicon, and stuff like that happens all that time, and what a whining cheat about the gay thing, just trying to get credit for something she's not willing to take a risk on.

Which might be a stronger point if he hadn't used himself as an example of how to handle gay characters instead.

See, Jessica? This way your blood pressure is much safer.

Also, she makes too much money.

Bitch.

And speaking of the whole thing, fandom wank has a new update, including links to articles in the New Yorker and the Chicago Tribune.

I was reading Fandom Wank last night, and I think except for one comment (about how the respondent was so shocked she dropped her monocle into her martini) everybody there doesn't quite realize that the New Yorker is doing the anime squint at the whole thing: o.O

Not that the New Yorker would cop to calling it an anime squint, but the article dripped with condescenscion-border-on-contempt, and many of the respondents seemed worried that the writer was taking Steve Vander Ark's side. I was like, Oh honeys, I am absolutely sure that the New Yorker thinks that both he and you are exotic zoo animals. So don't worry.

The New Yorker article was written by Tim Wu, who's written another article about the whole thing in Slate (both made of fail, IMO) and is apparently one of the Stanford Fair Use people.

They weren't really prequels as the continuing stories of the other Battle School kids.

You're right, I just couldn't think of a better word. Parallelquels?

and Bean just rocks

Ah, and that's where you and I differ. Bean was fine as a secondary character in Ender's Game, but as a protagonist I found him to be a giant bore. I wanted more Peter and Valentine.

Ender's Game: Harry Potter as Harry Potter: Lexicon

Er...buh?

Look away now if you want to keep not reading OSC's non-fiction.

So as not to reinterpret or lose tone...it is possible I'm missing the point...

Rowling "feels like her words were stolen," said lawyer Dan Shallman.

Well, heck, I feel like the plot of my novel Ender's Game was stolen by J.K. Rowling.

A young kid growing up in an oppressive family situation suddenly learns that he is one of a special class of children with special abilities, who are to be educated in a remote training facility where student life is dominated by an intense game played by teams flying in midair, at which this kid turns out to be exceptionally talented and a natural leader. He trains other kids in unauthorized extra sessions, which enrages his enemies, who attack him with the intention of killing him; but he is protected by his loyal, brilliant friends and gains strength from the love of some of his family members. He is given special guidance by an older man of legendary accomplishments who previously kept the enemy at bay. He goes on to become the crucial figure in a struggle against an unseen enemy who threatens the whole world.

This paragraph lists only the most prominent similarities between Ender's Game and the Harry Potter series.

An intense game played by teams flying in midair. Well, will you look at that.

Other than the "intense game played in midair" part, isn't that the plot of like half the kids fantasy novels in existence?