Mal: I call you back? Wash: No, Mal. You didn't. Zoe: I take full responsibility, cap.

'Out Of Gas'


Literary Buffistas 3: Don't Parse the Blurb, Dear.

There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."


Volans - Jun 21, 2007 1:39:55 pm PDT #2934 of 28195
move out and draw fire

Toddson is me w/r/t Temeraire. And I had this uncomfortable feeling it was written to be a movie...which I will go see anyway.

I just finished Night Watch at least the part that the movie was based on. The plot/story of the movie was hard to follow, but the book was not. I like it; it's got a very Russian sensibility, naturally, that is fun to read in modern fantasy as opposed to Communist-era fantasy like Margarita It's an essay in the making.


Polter-Cow - Jun 21, 2007 9:03:38 pm PDT #2935 of 28195
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

Advantages to Dating Librarians.


Connie Neil - Jun 22, 2007 5:09:15 am PDT #2936 of 28195
brillig

Damn you, Polter, that made *me* cringe just reading it.


Steph L. - Jun 22, 2007 6:44:29 am PDT #2937 of 28195
I look more rad than Lutheranism

::snerk:: Come on -- a book with an unsullied spine is a book that has been horribly neglected!

ION, a few months ago, Jilli mentioned The Anubis Gates, and it sounded intriguing, so I put it on hold at the library. I finally started it last night -- OMG SO GOOD!

Although I'm apparently as fuzzy on what "steampunk" is as I am about what "cyberpunk" is. (I know, several of you have explained cyberpunk to me, but I still don't exactly understand it, based on the examples I've been given. Like, Hec said that the 9/11 hijackers using box-cutters was very cyberpunk, and I don't get it. Shouldn't technology have been involved? Isn't that where the "cyber" comes from?)

I even read the Wikipedia pages on steampunk and cyberpunk last night, and I have concluded that I am completely ignorant and will never be able to understand what, exactly, they are.

It's like those "Magic Eye" pictures, where it looks like a patterned jumble, and ALLEGEDLY a 3-D picture emerges from the jumble. I have never been able to see the 3-D picture. Not even once. I suspect they're a big scam that the entire world is in on, to make me feel deficient.

Well, my inability to understand what cyberpunk (and now steampunk) is like that, too. Everyone *else* seems to understand it, but my brain won't comprehend it.

Still The Anubis Gates is really damn good so far.


Polter-Cow - Jun 22, 2007 6:50:27 am PDT #2938 of 28195
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

Like, Hec said that the 9/11 hijackers using box-cutters was very cyberpunk, and I don't get it.

What? Neither do I, and I thought I mostly understood cyberpunk. Well, probably not, as I think it mostly involves computers and robots and a general punkish attitude. Whereas steampunk is more the same sensibility as cyberpunk, except the computers are made of string and toast.


Steph L. - Jun 22, 2007 6:52:46 am PDT #2939 of 28195
I look more rad than Lutheranism

Whereas steampunk is more the same sensibility as cyberpunk, except the computers are made of string and toast.

I actually *do* understand steampunk better than I do cyberpunk. Chatty!co-worker is trying to explain cyberpunk to me, and he told me that maybe I'm incapable of understanding it because I'm ludditepunk.


Connie Neil - Jun 22, 2007 6:56:57 am PDT #2940 of 28195
brillig

ludditepunk.

Able to have a badass attitude no matter what the ambient level of technology is?


DavidS - Jun 22, 2007 8:07:56 am PDT #2941 of 28195
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Like, Hec said that the 9/11 hijackers using box-cutters was very cyberpunk, and I don't get it. Shouldn't technology have been involved? Isn't that where the "cyber" comes from?

9/11 in its planning, execution and politics seemed like it came straight out of a Bruce Sterling novel to me.

Sterling's fiction and non-fiction is interested in how people use technology, not high technology. In fact, much of his fiction is interested in finding new uses for old technology to hack contemporary systems.

And hacking wasn't about breaking into a computer, but about figuring out and exploiting the weakness in a system.

So the weakness in airline security was an outmoded policy about how to deal with hijackers. What the terrorists understood better than anybody was that an airplane is a gigantic bomb. They exploited the weakness in the system (hacked it) with low tech (box cutters).

That's a scenario that recurs in Sterling's work. The early cyberpuynks were interested in the "elegance" of outthinking a system with the most efficient means. They were interested in how marginal groups use technology against the people who presumably own that technology.

He was also very prescient about the conflicts between the West and the Muslim countries, though most cyberpunk writers saw that coming.


Steph L. - Jun 22, 2007 8:17:07 am PDT #2942 of 28195
I look more rad than Lutheranism

I'm not trying to be deliberately obtuse, I swear.

I just don't think of box cutters as "technology," so that's part of where my disconnect comes from.


§ ita § - Jun 22, 2007 8:26:14 am PDT #2943 of 28195
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Although I don't quite buy the larger point, Steph, just think of any tool as technology.

There's been a jargon misuse that might not be recovered from--hackers doesn't have an automatic negative connotation, or didn't. It's like being a digital McGyver. It's about the insights, not so much the raw power. Although being shiny is still often a status symbol.