Alastair Reynolds!
'Beneath You'
Literary Buffistas 3: Don't Parse the Blurb, Dear.
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
Sox suggested Banks as well...guess I should read some of his stuff?
Well, whatever you like about Stross he's copying from Banks, but not as well.
A book for Jilli. The cover's lovely.
And, Jilli, I hope you enjoy the book I sent more than I did. It just didn't ping me like I thought it would.
Well, whatever you like about Stross he's copying from Banks, but not as well.
In what ways, David?
The cover's lovely.
The blurb made my head explode. Boom. Now I'm dead.
Avenge me!
A book for Jilli. The cover's lovely.
The cover is pretty.
The blurb made my head explode. Boom. Now I'm dead.
Yeeeeaaah. IIRC, I looked at a copy in Powell's, went "oh the fuck no", and put it down. I have ... issues with overly-romance-trope takes on Dracula. (Yes, even tho' I like the Coppola movie version.)
Avenge me!
From beyond the grave, hon. I will.
And, Jilli, I hope you enjoy the book I sent more than I did. It just didn't ping me like I thought it would.
It looks like fun! And it will probably be my bathtime reading tonight. And the coffee mug! Eeeee! That has become my new favorite mug. (Toddson sent me a pink mug with black lettering that says Nevermind Princess, I want to be a VAMPIRE.)
I saw that mug and knew you had to have it. Then it sat for about a month waiting for me to get off my ass and send it.
The book ... I don't know if I wasn't in the right mood, but it just wasn't what I wanted. But the second book's out now - saw it in the store last week.
In what ways, David?
Well, first of all I don't think Stross is a very good writer. His books read like RPG manuals. (Which he used to write.)
I know that Glasshouse was specifically emulating Banks' culture novels, something Stross acknowledges.
For somebody who is interested in writing about the effects of radical body reinvention he doesn't have a lot of psychological subtlety in his work. Characters wear their bodies like suits, and their subjective experiences seem very static in relation to that.
Compared to somebody like Delaney or Leguin he's got absolutely no sense of how a gender fluid character might think or feel.
I think he's good with extrapolating the implications of the hard science and how radical the effects of those changes could be. But his sense of character seems really conventional to me.
I've read several books by both Stross and Banks, and it would never occur to me to compare them. They're really not very similar at all.
What have you read besides Glasshouse?