Counterpoint: [link]
River ,'Out Of Gas'
Literary Buffistas 3: Don't Parse the Blurb, Dear.
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
Loving Jessica's and Tom's links.
Slate's take on the HBO version (still reading, not sure how I feel): [link]
Is Slate trying to piss people off? Oh, wait, yes, it is. Because then people will post links and they'll get more traffic.
A reasonably-written review that made an attempt at discussing the value of the show wouldn't get nearly as much traction as that will.
Vomit.
Unlike some of the commenters, I don't insist someone must be a fan of the genre to review a tv show. And there may be some value in that review, but it's buried in the impenetrable prose.
I thought the whole point was that it wasn't dragon-ridden.
I'm not very far in.
It is wild: about 50% of Slate's columns are really interesting and informative. The other 50% are just flame fodder. I don't get it.
Is Slate trying to piss people off? Oh, wait, yes, it is. Because then people will post links and they'll get more traffic.
My thoughts exactly. The headline is pure clickbait, so what's below it doesn't much matter.
there may be some value in that review, but it's buried in the impenetrable prose.
Also this. My eyes glazed over after about the first paragraph. (I'm pretty sure the writer was trying to parody the kind of dense prose she thinks the books are written in? Unfortunately, she's no George RR Martin and my brain immediately filed the whole thing under tl;dr.)
[eta: Oops, don't know where I got "she" from - Troy isn't usually a girl's name.]
It is wild: about 50% of Slate's columns are really interesting and informative. The other 50% are just flame fodder.
this.