I already know what I'm gonna call her. Got a name all picked out...

Mal ,'Out Of Gas'


Fan Fiction: Writers, Readers, and Enablers  

This thread is for fanfic recs, links, and discussion, but not for actual posting of fanfic.


erikaj - Aug 17, 2004 8:01:38 am PDT #8836 of 10000
Always Anti-fascist!

Personally, when I write, my preference is for more tender sex. But I do realize that's a taste of mine and does not render other kinds of writing crap or anything.


Calli - Aug 17, 2004 8:05:53 am PDT #8837 of 10000
I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul—Calvin and Hobbs

Mulder and Krycek probably don't like each other a lot of the time, but they're awfully hot together.

Yes. They introduced me to slash fic. <Goes off to happy fantasy place where Mulder and Krycek lean over Calli's shoulder pointing out the really good M/K stories.> Ah, good times.

I've generally nodded at the definition that erotica is the sexy stuff I like and porn is that nasty stuff the other person likes. Which is not terribly helpful, and, to be honest, I've read some stuff that I'd call porn and that I really quite liked. I do think there's a line between the two, but it's hazy and seems to shift around a lot from person to person. For that matter, there's stuff in Harlequins that I'd call porn -- complete with lurve and flowers -- and some explicit NC-17 guy on guy fic that I'd call erotica. None of which is getting us anywhere, is it? Oh well. <Goes back to happy place with Mulder and Krycek. Remembers she's at work. Swears quietly and goes back to coding.>


Katie M - Aug 17, 2004 8:10:42 am PDT #8838 of 10000
I was charmed (albeit somewhat perplexed) by the fannish sensibility of many of the music choices -- it's like the director was trying to vid Canada. --loligo on the Olympic Opening Ceremonies

As far as I'm concerned, if it's written to be arousing it's porn. But I don't attach a negative connotation to the word, particularly. ("Erotica" just sounds silly to me. "No no, it's not porn!! It's much classier!" Uh-huh.)


Dana - Aug 17, 2004 8:17:47 am PDT #8839 of 10000
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.

But Katie, women aren't supposed to enjoy porn, let alone produce it.

No one tell shrift, okay, because I'm rather attached to her porn.


Am-Chau Yarkona - Aug 17, 2004 8:20:27 am PDT #8840 of 10000
I bop to Wittgenstein. -- Nutty

Are you going to reply?

I'm debating that, connie. Last time I got flamed, it was on a story I'd co-written, and I and Raven had great fun replying, but this is a rather different case.

if only to establish which story she's talking about.

That would be my primary reason, I think. I'm curious.

...is this making any sense outside my own head?

I know what you mean, Fay.

And Dana and Consuela and Nutty and others. It's a problem, and one I usually overcome by reading things that are recced or writers I trust, and shutting the window if I don't like it.

Thanks for the imput, people. I'm going to sleep on it, and decide what to do in the morning.


Consuela - Aug 17, 2004 8:26:11 am PDT #8841 of 10000
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix

I tend to prefer to call it "smut". I haven't figure out why I prefer that. Will have to ponder it.


Deena - Aug 17, 2004 8:35:26 am PDT #8842 of 10000
How are you me? You need to stop that. Only I can be me. ~Kara

In my tiny mind:
smut=bodice ripper;
erotica=literary porn, not always nice;
porn=unnaturally big breasted women or uncannily well-endowed, but otherwise boring-as-toast, men doing tacky and not at all arousing for the very tackiness things, all enhanced by an excess of gratuitious genitalia shots or description, topped with unbelieveable plot, settings,and characterization.

I seem to have become addicted to the Michael/Nikita thing (I wonder what made me think of that?). Is there more we could snark at, Dana?


Katie M - Aug 17, 2004 8:38:33 am PDT #8843 of 10000
I was charmed (albeit somewhat perplexed) by the fannish sensibility of many of the music choices -- it's like the director was trying to vid Canada. --loligo on the Olympic Opening Ceremonies

But Katie, women aren't supposed to enjoy porn, let alone produce it.

I do have to admit that I spend some energy reminding myself of this in the Wider World. ("Oops, can't say that to the co-workers...")


Dana - Aug 17, 2004 8:39:50 am PDT #8844 of 10000
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.

Nothing terribly entertaining, although there's promise in the new story she's started. This makes her third in progress, and it's a co-written version of a really terrible movie that Roy Dupuis starred in. They've promised to take out the cannibalism and inbreeding, but leave in the sex.


Fay - Aug 17, 2004 8:40:22 am PDT #8845 of 10000
"Fuck Western ideologically-motivated gender identification!" Sulu gasped, and came.

If there are positive emotions (doesn't need to be love/like is ok) it's erotica. Just nasty manipulative sex is porn.

Yes, I do think this is ridiculous. There don't have to be positive emotions going on, either love or like - but then, angsty conflicted angry push-pull of unwilling desire sex pretty much delivers a round house kick to my kink buttons and fuses them, so I would say that. Er.

It's about language, isn't it? 'Cause I prefer the word 'porn' to smut or erotica, much as I generally prefer to use the word 'cock' rather than 'manhood' or 'sex' etc etc.

I think maybe all I mean is - if it's badly written, it's (with the negative connotation) just porn. If it's well written, it's not. Whether teh sex is a positive or a negative expression of the characters' emotions or desires is neither here nor there in terms of whether it pings me as 'just' porn.

....but in practical terms I do generally just use 'porn' to mean stories in which people's rude bits get some quality time with bare skin.