Zoe: She shot you. Mal: Well, yeah, she did a bit... still --

'Serenity'


Fan Fiction: Writers, Readers, and Enablers  

This thread is for fanfic recs, links, and discussion, but not for actual posting of fanfic.


Michele T. - Dec 23, 2002 11:39:18 am PST #1992 of 10000
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi

I thought that given the premise, the Buffy of "Thaw" made sense, but I can understand why you wouldn't. Hm. I will see if I can think up other things.


Katie M - Dec 23, 2002 11:40:50 am PST #1993 of 10000
I was charmed (albeit somewhat perplexed) by the fannish sensibility of many of the music choices -- it's like the director was trying to vid Canada. --loligo on the Olympic Opening Ceremonies

Katie, if you're really interested in that whole argument, there was a huge discussion about these issues on Glass_Onion a while back, where people tried to resolve what was appropriate to cross-post to the list versus LJs and blogs and whatnot.

Yeah, I'll keep that in mind - thanks. (Of course, then I'll be sitting on my hands wanting to reply to months-old discussion, which is even worse, but there you go.)


Katie M - Dec 23, 2002 11:41:30 am PST #1994 of 10000
I was charmed (albeit somewhat perplexed) by the fannish sensibility of many of the music choices -- it's like the director was trying to vid Canada. --loligo on the Olympic Opening Ceremonies

Oh, and no, ita, I don't mind at all. When you start inserting rude secret messages, then I'll mind.


embitca - Dec 23, 2002 11:46:42 am PST #1995 of 10000
http://www.digitalcandy.net/~embitca

Can I just plead that you not link us in fandom_wank? The point may be moot, but...I'm feeling a little isolationist today.

Well, I think I explained in my LJ comments yesterday why I decided against linking to fandom_wank so I'm surprised many of you are so worried about it now. But, I can't really stop someone else from deciding to do it if they find it worthy. Although honestly I don't see why they would unless we start calling each other names. And you all are too polite for that. (I, on the other hand, am not LOL)


embitca - Dec 23, 2002 11:50:27 am PST #1996 of 10000
http://www.digitalcandy.net/~embitca

Consuela, I honestly don't see that I took the remarks I quoted out of context. In fact, I was careful to preserve most of her two posts rather than just quoting the lines I personally found offensive. But yes, we do draw lines in different places. At any rate, thanks for the welcome.


Consuela - Dec 23, 2002 11:55:02 am PST #1997 of 10000
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix

Well, I meant the more general context of the Buffista community and our knowledge of Theodosia as an individual, not just a poster on a random board, if you see what I mean.

I didn't mean to imply that you implied she said something she didn't. (Can I add another "imply" in there somewhere?)

It's just that this is a community familiar with itself, and so our responses to one of our own may be different from a stranger's responses. Does that make any sense?


shrift - Dec 23, 2002 12:00:54 pm PST #1998 of 10000
"You can't put a price on the joy of not giving a shit." -Zenkitty

I'm just setting myself up to poke at her Crow/LFN WIP

Bugger me sideways.

Was gonna go looking for you, but now I'm thinking that there's not enough love to go around today.


Kristen - Dec 23, 2002 12:01:14 pm PST #1999 of 10000

Fay - Dec 23, 2002 12:04:22 pm PST #2000 of 10000
"Fuck Western ideologically-motivated gender identification!" Sulu gasped, and came.

Jesus. Can I apologise unreservedly for bringing up the subject of RPF in the first place? That'll teach me to keep my mouth shut. Or at least to keep my Meta ramblings to my LJ. I am really, REALLY sorry (about almost provoking embitca to do the link thing).

Well, I think I explained in my LJ comments yesterday why I decided against linking to fandom_wank so I'm surprised many of you are so worried about it now.

Bless you for holding fire on the fandom_wank linkage. It's mad, isn't it? Because yes, of course I know that everything here and in the LJ etc etc is in a public forum. But....argh...

(tries to articulate feelings, without much success.)

The thing is, I know I really treasure this community. I totally welcome lurkers delurking/your good self tracking the link and coming to chip in, but the prospect of an avalanche of people busting in with a specific agenda, in reaction to one comment that's been linked to - this pushes my isolationist buttons. We've had a little taste of that lately, with Joss and Tim posting about the Firefly cancellation. But in point of fact the mad shouty people were few and far between - and indeed we got a number of people who had a look around, liked what they saw and joined in. So I should chill my boots and stop worrying, probably. Argh.

I think I feel a bit like a maiden aunt taking tea with the vicar in some Oscar Wildean drawing room where the conversation is cheerily fluctuating between porn and politics and Hello Kitty toasters. Yes, it's open to anyone, but I'm still horrified by the prospect of big-ass groups of random people showing up to shout and piss on the china.

Er.

In breaking news, it appears that I am some form of Luddite. Or Tory. Shoot me now.

Anyway - yes, good, glad you're here.

eta.

Wooo! Inadvertant Number Whore! Go Me!


embitca - Dec 23, 2002 12:09:27 pm PST #2001 of 10000
http://www.digitalcandy.net/~embitca

It's just that this is a community familiar with itself, and so our responses to one of our own may be different from a stranger's responses. Does that make any sense?

Yes, of course, that absolutely makes sense. But you seemed to be implying that because I am a stranger to this community and therefore do not know her and cannot put her remarks in historical context re the Buffistas community, that it is rude for me to comment on her remarks in another forum. All I can say is that I disagree and that despite the missing context, I should still be able to take her remarks at face value.