I wonder if The Third Man was bumped because it's not American enough.
It's regularly near the top of the list of British films.
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
I wonder if The Third Man was bumped because it's not American enough.
It's regularly near the top of the list of British films.
For some reason, I am unable to paste into text boxes. But, Scola, I don't know if it's so much the magic in my heart as the idea of the story itself, one man having all these effects and ripples throughout American history. It's one of my Things, the way our lives affect other lives, the way we can have an impact on a greater scale.
I didn't hate watching Forrest Gump, but I never thought it was Great, you know?
I also think Pulp Fiction gets much better in retrospect, because walking out of the theater, I was saying that there were about 45 minutes I would have cut out of the movie, but now I mostly remember the awesome parts.
Unpopular opinions on movies I have seen: Cabaret is boring, aside from its musical sequences. You know what else? Some quirkiness ages well, and some doesn't. Good: Julie Andrews in Sound of Music; Diane Keaton in Godfather. Not so: Liza in Cabaret.
I wonder if The Third Man was bumped because it's not American enough.
Given that it was a European co-production, filmed in Europe, by a British director, based on a British author, I'm not sure why it was there in the first place.
It stars an American, is all I could guess.
It's one of my Things, the way our lives affect other lives, the way we can have an impact on a greater scale.
But It's A Wonderful Life did all that so much better, without gagsome political subtext and cheesy CGI amputees!
eta: I should say, without a political subtext that is gagsome to me, as IAWL certainly has a grassrootsy communitarian-populist subtext that I like just fine but I'm sure other people find as gagsome as Gump's creepy creepy Morning In Americatude.
In short, I am a big ol' hypocrite. But still, anything FG did, IAWL did better to the power of 10.
Sean, if you feel so inclined, you can go to this page and listen to me caterwauling out-of-tune about Myrna Loy.
Corwood, that song is AWESOME!
But, Scola, I don't know if it's so much the magic in my heart as the idea of the story itself, one man having all these effects and ripples throughout American history. It's one of my Things, the way our lives affect other lives, the way we can have an impact on a greater scale.
Sure, that's a great concept. But in Forrest Gump, I just felt it was executed in a really lame and twee way.
Everybody express an opinion on a movie you haven't seen.
Citizen Kane is a stupid movie about a sled.
as the idea of the story itself, one man having all these effects and ripples throughout American history.
Couldn't you just like Zelig instead of the reactionary right wing Gump? Which basically says "even though American culture was retarded before the counter culture came along, it was better."