Handsome brooding vampire guy has to swoop in all sensitive mouth and overhanging forehead. How 'bout leaving some scraps for the homely-looking fellows who don't turn evil when they get some?

Doyle ,'Life of the Party'


Buffista Movies 5: Development Hell  

A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.


Strega - Jul 20, 2006 9:14:11 am PDT #3036 of 10001

Yeah, Disney's attempt at an intervention was in Defamer a while back as well.

I saw the Village long after knowing the end. And honestly, if he'd put the big reveal in the first 15 minutes instead of the last, it'd really be a good movie. Which just makes it that much more frustrating.

Does he have any concept of how Hollywood works?

I'm pretty sure it works like this: if you consistently make hundreds of millions of dollars for a studio, you can do anything you like.


Sean K - Jul 20, 2006 9:14:48 am PDT #3037 of 10001
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

I actually saw D.E.B.S. in the theater at full price and enjoyed the hell out of it, but possibly because I saw it with meara. We have a history of seeing really silly and stupid movies with hot chicks in them together. We saw Honey in the theater and had a blast.


§ ita § - Jul 20, 2006 9:17:13 am PDT #3038 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

if you consistently make hundreds of millions of dollars for a studio, you can do anything you like.

I can't read the article, so I can't be sure, but isn't it contradicting this?


Strega - Jul 20, 2006 9:44:03 am PDT #3039 of 10001

Not really; he dumped Disney; they still wanted him. The dinner confrontation ended this way:

After way too many courses, Disney executives walked Shyamalan and his agent to the elevator, and Cook asked to speak to the director alone.

"Just make the movie for us," Cook said, hoping to keep Disney's most important director in the fold. "We'll give you $60 million and say, 'Do what you want with it.' We won't touch it. We'll see you at the premiere."


§ ita § - Jul 20, 2006 9:50:23 am PDT #3040 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Aha. Thanks.

It'd surprise me if no big bucks director ever got shown the door, but it's not something I have ammo for.


Hayden - Jul 20, 2006 10:17:45 am PDT #3041 of 10001
aka "The artist formerly known as Corwood Industries."

I was going to call him a douche, but "scrunt" is a much better word.


sumi - Jul 20, 2006 12:20:14 pm PDT #3042 of 10001
Art Crawl!!!

Heath Ledger as the Joker?


Aims - Jul 20, 2006 12:27:39 pm PDT #3043 of 10001
Shit's all sorts of different now.

bangs head on desk

I don't know a whole lot about Batman, other than what Joe has told me and what I have gotten from the movies. But first of all, I was really hoping the Batman Begins fanchise would NOT do The Joker. At least not for awhile. Every other franchise has done him. Find someone else. Give The Riddler another shot without that jackass Carey effing him up. Do Two-Face again. Good lord, try Poison Ivy again. But anyone, anyone but The Joker.

Second of all, Heath Ledger? SERIOUSLY??


erikaj - Jul 20, 2006 12:33:41 pm PDT #3044 of 10001
Always Anti-fascist!

nah. Would like a Poison Ivy movie.


sumi - Jul 20, 2006 12:36:37 pm PDT #3045 of 10001
Art Crawl!!!

I think that just because the Joker is in the film doesn't mean it's going to be all about the Joker.