'Shindig'
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Somewhat relatedly, I saw Superman again yesterday (still love it, saw more flaws this time) and afterwards, I couldn't remember if the city is ever actually named as Metropolis. On Luthor's map, I could only see New York -- and I was looking for Gotham and Metropolis this time -- and thinking back, I can't recall a single scene where someone says "Metropolis."
Anyone with a better memory than mine able to confirm one way or the other?
It is. Man, my visual memory is flaking on me, but I think, for sure, the wharf was Metropolis Port/Wharf/Docks. I can remember seeing it somewhere else...perhaps on the side of one of the boats. And a vague memory of hearing it in a news report.
It's definitely Metropolis. I'm not sure if anyone ever says it, though I think they probably do in some of the news reports, but I saw the name on a few signs too.
edit: or, what ita said.
Superman Returns – *** I remember Metropolis on a sign at the wharf too. Also, I think it may have been on the masthead of the Daily Planet, but I'm not sure.
Also, looks like quite a bit got cut from the final movie, including scenes where Martha encourages Clark to go back to the paper and find his place back in the world. I think the movie would have benefited if those scenes had been in there. ***
Margaret Weis says that she likes the script for Dragons of Autumn Twilight.
Re: Stardust
Great cast too.
Not so sure about that. The casting of Captain Shakespeare is a worring sign that the movie might infact turn out to be dogpoo.
So, we rented The New World last night. Despite both the BF and I being Malick fans, we found it so ponderous and meandering that we stopped watching about halfway through. The young girl is mesmerizing, but not enough to repay those precious minutes of my life ticking away. And this reaction from two people who adore Jarmusch films and can watch them over and over. Anyone else have this reaction?
Quite the opposite for me. In fact, I found it so mesmerizing that I watched it again the next day. It's my favorite Malick after Badlands.
I saw it multiple times in theatres, too. Haven't watched it on DVD yet because I'm not sure the small screen can really do it justice -- part of the love comes from the experience of just being enveloped by the film's universe. (Though if the DVD came with a "no voiceover" option on the soundtrack, I might be tempted.)
Oh, I even loved the voiceovers. Malick does voiceovers like no one else.
I didn't catch it in theaters ('cause with a 17-month-old, I don't catch anything in theaters), but found myself enveloped in Malick's world on DVD with a 34" tv.