I saw it multiple times in theatres, too. Haven't watched it on DVD yet because I'm not sure the small screen can really do it justice -- part of the love comes from the experience of just being enveloped by the film's universe. (Though if the DVD came with a "no voiceover" option on the soundtrack, I might be tempted.)
Buffista Movies 5: Development Hell
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Oh, I even loved the voiceovers. Malick does voiceovers like no one else.
I didn't catch it in theaters ('cause with a 17-month-old, I don't catch anything in theaters), but found myself enveloped in Malick's world on DVD with a 34" tv.
Thanks for the comments, guys. We were both exhausted and probably unduly cranky. I'll give it another go.
I hope you do and hope you enjoy it on rewatch. But give yourself some distance.
I thought the movie was a great example of Malick's metaphysical belief in the interconnectedness of all people, as well as a wonderful metaphor for transition and the meaning of struggle and dialectic. But, yeah, like all Malick, you have to accept it on its own terms.
I do not think I am a Malick person, as The Thin Red Line is one of the few movies after which I honestly wanted my time back. (The only other one that comes to mind is Troy, though that may have been only my money, at the very least.)
I do not think I am a Malick person, as The Thin Red Line is one of the few movies after which I honestly wanted my time back.
You and me both, baby. (I think we've talked about that before, haven't we?)
At least 1 full hour could have been trimmed from the movie if those Long Brooding Shots of Jesus Caviezel were cut out.
I don't think I even had the presence of mind to fall asleep.
And when it finally ends, there's this lovely shot zooming out over the water, and it would be a great place to end the movie, but no. Random shot of an alligator, random shot of another alligator, random shot of a tree.
It's like the pretentious cinematography version of "Llama llama duck."
I'd say pretentious yes, pointless no.
I do not think I am a Malick person, as The Thin Red Line is one of the few movies after which I honestly wanted my time back.
You and me both, baby. (I think we've talked about that before, haven't we?)
You, PC AND my DH are as one.