You know, I have to wonder, had the old show been done serious instead of campy, if West would be doing that sort of thing now. Has he ever discussed having read the comcs? I suspect his only example of the character was the one he portrayed, so Batman is probably firmly entrenched in his mind as being "silly". (As it was for many people until Burton's Batman.)
Buffista Movies 5: Development Hell
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Matt! Batman Beyond! How cool would that be?
To be fair, 60s era Batman comics were as silly as the show...
Dork Knight vs. Dark Knight.
I have to confess an unhealthy love for the '60s TV show. And especially the '60s movie.
But then, I like high camp.
I like shark repellent.
And hard water.
New Spider-Man 3 trailer
Eeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!! Venom! Venom! VENOM!!!!!
Also -- was that Gwen Stacy?
And man, James Franco is so fucking hot.
In conclusion, let's make out Venom! Venom! VENOM!!!!
Also -- was that Gwen Stacy?
Yup. (Why introduce her now, I have no clue.)
I'm worried that it's going to fall prey to "Too Many Villians" syndrome. Do we really need Venom, Sandman and the Green Goblin II in one movie? Especially when Peter has to get the symbiote, realize it's evil, get rid of it and then have it attach itself to Eddie Brock and become Venom in the same film that you've got these other two baddies running around.
Unless this thing is going to be 3 hours long, I don't know how they're going to pull it off without it being a chaotic mess.
I have to confess an unhealthy love for the '60s TV show. And especially the '60s movie.
I stand beside you in unhealthy love.